On 12.12.2016 22:00, Michaël Michaud wrote:
> Hi Ede,
>
> No problem, if you revert the code in the core, I'll revert the code in
> Roadmatcher.
done
> But maybe changing back the method signature will now break the core...
> let's see.
nP.. got that covered.. ede
--
Hi Ede,
No problem, if you revert the code in the core, I'll revert the code in
Roadmatcher.
But maybe changing back the method signature will now break the core...
let's see.
Michaël
Le 12/12/2016 à 12:06, edgar.sol...@web.de a écrit :
> On 07.12.2016 20:46, Michaël Michaud wrote:
>> a thir
On 07.12.2016 20:46, Michaël Michaud wrote:
> a third problem arose with WorkbenchContext#getErrorHandler where you
> changed the return type from ErrorHandler to ErrorHandler2
> I thought this is OK (called covariance isn't it), but fort a reason, I
> get compilation errors. Maybe you know why.
Hi,
Several things :
2 methods of which I had reduced the visibility in OpenJUMP core. I'll
be more careful in my next update.
one regression due to the generification of CollectionMap. Usually,
generification does not imply regressions, but this case was quite
complex with array of collectio
can you quickly elaborate what broke it? ..ede
On 07.12.2016 08:52, Michaël Michaud wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just upgraded RoadMatcher so that it is compatible with future OJ1.10
> (need last NB of OJ)
>
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/jump-pilot/files/OpenJUMP_plugins/More%20Plugins/
>
> Please,
Thanks Michael
Il 07/Dic/2016 08:52, "Michaël Michaud" ha
scritto:
> Hi,
>
> I just upgraded RoadMatcher so that it is compatible with future OJ1.10
> (need last NB of OJ)
>
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/jump-pilot/files/OpenJUMP_plugins/More%
> 20Plugins/
>
> Please, report any problem,
>
Hi,
I just upgraded RoadMatcher so that it is compatible with future OJ1.10
(need last NB of OJ)
https://sourceforge.net/projects/jump-pilot/files/OpenJUMP_plugins/More%20Plugins/
Please, report any problem,
Michaël
