this is as i understand it as well ... ede
> Java classloading is a _very_ delicate thing.
> I wouldn't change anything if not necessary.
> Since it now works (I think it works) I see no reason to change it.
> It may as well be that it has no parent for some specific reason.
>
> Also the Java spec
Java classloading is a _very_ delicate thing.
I wouldn't change anything if not necessary.
Since it now works (I think it works) I see no reason to change it.
It may as well be that it has no parent for some specific reason.
Also the Java spec for ClassLoader.getParent() says:
"...Returns the pare
