Re: [JPP-Devel] OpenJUMP & OpenJDK

2012-01-02 Thread Michaël Michaud
Wow, thanks I will not be able to make a tenth of the tests you and others are doing these days... Michaël Le 02/01/2012 13:59, edgar.sol...@web.de a écrit : > On 02.01.2012 13:19, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: >> On 02.01.2012 12:13, Giuseppe Aruta wrote: >>> And Ede's Change coordinate system to

Re: [JPP-Devel] OpenJUMP & OpenJDK

2012-01-02 Thread Michaël Michaud
ot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net *Inviato:* Domenica 1 Gennaio 2012 22:47 *Oggetto:* Re: [JPP-Devel] OpenJUMP & OpenJDK Hi, > generally openjdk should do the trick. however, if the osgeo folks want to be sure they should include the "original" jvm. I think there is a change in

Re: [JPP-Devel] OpenJUMP & OpenJDK

2012-01-02 Thread edgar . soldin
On 02.01.2012 13:19, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: > On 02.01.2012 12:13, Giuseppe Aruta wrote: >> And Ede's Change coordinate system tool, Anyhow right now I don't see any >> difference on using OpenJUMP tools (whether or not depending on geotools >> classes). Anyhow I agree with you to test those

Re: [JPP-Devel] OpenJUMP & OpenJDK

2012-01-02 Thread edgar . soldin
On 02.01.2012 12:13, Giuseppe Aruta wrote: > And Ede's Change coordinate system tool, Anyhow right now I don't see any > difference on using OpenJUMP tools (whether or not depending on geotools > classes). Anyhow I agree with you to test those tools. tested cts-0.2 successfully with openjdk7 for

Re: [JPP-Devel] OpenJUMP & OpenJDK

2012-01-02 Thread edgar . soldin
ound on the retiring the old DLJ http://robilad.livejournal.com/90792.html and on openjdk7 vs. oracle sdk7 http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1977238/why-should-i-use-the-sun-jdk-over-the-openjdk-or-vice-versa ..ede > > Peppe > > *Da:* Michaël Michaud > *A:* jump-pilot-devel@lists.

Re: [JPP-Devel] OpenJUMP & OpenJDK

2012-01-02 Thread Giuseppe Aruta
't allow also programs to be shipped with jre. This not a problem with OpenJUMp but becomes a very big one with other java gis like GvSIG or Kosmo. Peppe Da: Michaël Michaud A: jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Inviato: Domenica 1 Gennaio 2012

Re: [JPP-Devel] OpenJUMP & OpenJDK

2012-01-01 Thread Michaël Michaud
Hi, > generally openjdk should do the trick. however, if the osgeo folks want to be > sure they should include the "original" jvm. I think there is a change in the Oracle JVM licence which is the reason why osgeo people want to migrate to OpenJDK Here is what Cameron Shorter, the project leader,

Re: [JPP-Devel] OpenJUMP & OpenJDK

2012-01-01 Thread edgar . soldin
On 01.01.2012 22:31, Michaël Michaud wrote: > Ede, Peppe, Matthias and linux users, > > Do you monitor live-d...@lists.osgeo.org list ? no sorry > There are discussions on which jvm will be included in the osgeo-live dvd > Seems that they want to check that all included softwares are compatible

[JPP-Devel] OpenJUMP & OpenJDK

2012-01-01 Thread Michaël Michaud
Ede, Peppe, Matthias and linux users, Do you monitor live-d...@lists.osgeo.org list ? There are discussions on which jvm will be included in the osgeo-live dvd Seems that they want to check that all included softwares are compatible with OpenJDK. Anyhow, if you notice any problem related to a p