Re: [JPP-Devel] Moving the JPP CVS to Subversion

2006-07-18 Thread Sunburned Surveyor
Looks like the bunch wants to Stick with CVS. I just thought I'd mention SVN since I'm now using it on OpenJUMP-Ex and I've even got the SVN plug-in for Eclipse working in Debian. :] You guys touch the code though, so we'll stick with CVS! The Sunburned Surveyor On 7/18/06, Larry Becker <[EMAIL

Re: [JPP-Devel] Moving the JPP CVS to Subversion

2006-07-18 Thread Larry Becker
Stefan,   Thanks for the link.  It does indeed put the supposed advantages of SVS over CVS in a new light.  The most compelling argument is always, "if it isn't broken, don't fix it."Larry On 7/18/06, Stefan Steiniger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: i would like to stay on CVS...there are no real advant

Re: [JPP-Devel] Moving the JPP CVS to Subversion

2006-07-18 Thread Stefan Steiniger
i would like to stay on CVS... there are no real advantages of subversion with respect to CVS.. see the link below http://www.pushok.com/soft_svn_vscvs.php and for now i am quite happy with it stefan Sunburned Surveyor wrote: >Would any of the developers currently working with the OpenJUMP CV

[JPP-Devel] Moving the JPP CVS to Subversion

2006-07-17 Thread Sunburned Surveyor
Would any of the developers currently working with the OpenJUMP CVS have a problem with moving the repository over to Subversion? I'd like to give this a try if it won't cause problems for others. If it will, I can wait until we are more "Subversion-Ready". Let me know what you guys think. The S