---
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pedro Doria
Meunier
Sent: April 14, 2007 3:30 PM
To: 'List for discussion of JPP development and use.'
Subject: Re: [JPP-Devel] Moving OpenJUMP Development To 1.5 JDK...
Hey Jon/Developers,
Apart from the developmen
Sent: April 14, 2007 3:30 PM
To: 'List for discussion of JPP development and use.'
Subject: Re: [JPP-Devel] Moving OpenJUMP Development To 1.5 JDK...
Hey Jon/Developers,
Apart from the development thread of OJ, perhaps it should be reminded that
most people by now use 1.5, if not 1.6
ril 14, 2007 3:30 PM
> To: 'List for discussion of JPP development and use.'
> Subject: Re: [JPP-Devel] Moving OpenJUMP Development To 1.5 JDK...
>
>
> Hey Jon/Developers,
>
> Apart from the development thread of OJ, perhaps it should be
> reminded that mo
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Jonathan Aquino
> Sent: sábado, 14 de Abril de 2007 21:45
> To: 'List for discussion of JPP development and use.'
> Subject: Re: [JPP-Devel] Moving OpenJUMP Development To 1.5 J
PM
> To: 'List for discussion of JPP development and use.'
> Subject: Re: [JPP-Devel] Moving OpenJUMP Development To 1.5 JDK...
>
>
> Hey Jon/Developers,
>
> Apart from the development thread of OJ, perhaps it should be
> reminded that most people by now
2007 21:45
To: 'List for discussion of JPP development and use.'
Subject: Re: [JPP-Devel] Moving OpenJUMP Development To 1.5 JDK...
I think I've got Java 1.4 installed on the box that does the nightly builds,
so let me know if we're moving to 1.5 and I'll upgrade it to 1.
> Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2007 11:47 AM
> To: List for discussion of JPP development and use.
> Subject: Re: [JPP-Devel] Moving OpenJUMP Development To 1.5 JDK...
>
>
> mhm.. i do not really know
> which features are exactly meant. But the reason why we are compiling
> wit
mhm.. i do not really know
which features are exactly meant. But the reason why we are compiling
with 1.5 is that I transfered some code from piroljump to OJ and they
used the new cast feature of arraylists.
so.. in some particular way we use it, but we did not change any old code
stefan
Sunbur
Boy do I feel sheepish! :]
Is there a reason why we avoided using the new language features of
Java 1.5if we are compiling with the
1.5 JDK?
Is there reasons to avoid using those features now?
Or are we already doing that to? :]
The Sunburned Surveyor
On 4/14/07, Larry Becker <[EMAIL PROTECT
Yes, I think the thread kind of got lost. I was talking about changing the
code to take advantage of Java 5''s features, not just compiling with it,
which as Stefan pointed out, we have been doing for quite some time.
Larry
On 4/14/07, Stefan Steiniger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hei Landon,
Hei Landon,
sorry .. but you should have recognized that we are already working with
1.5!!!
stefan
Sunburned Surveyor schrieb:
> I still need to hear back from Vivid Solutions, but if I get a positive
> response to them I'd like to propose moving development of OpenJUMP to
> the 1.5 JDK. This
I still need to hear back from Vivid Solutions, but if I get a positive
response to them I'd like to propose moving development of OpenJUMP to the
1.5 JDK. This would mean we'd compile OpenJUMP with that JDK and do our
testing on the corresponding JRE.
We'd also have to check with Jon about updat
12 matches
Mail list logo
