Re: [JPP-Devel] Fwd: Suggested Procedures For Collaborative Development Of OpenJUMP

2007-02-21 Thread Stefan Steiniger
Hei, I have not read fully all the email/blog entrie.. but i saw a quite impressive list of changes on kosmo and i wonder if all this changes are not to much/necessary. Anyway I also say a "hello again" to Erwans team and the kosmo people (to the latter: please write to this list on issues of co

Re: [JPP-Devel] Fwd: Suggested Procedures For Collaborative Development Of OpenJUMP

2007-02-21 Thread erwan bocher
Hi, It's a very good news for OpenJUMP but as said Paolo Rizzi and Manuel, core matter is a very important one. Currently there are various OJ versions and all take part in the creation of a code chaotic. Sigle took part there. By merging the best we can have a robuste and complete GIS with OJ.

[JPP-Devel] Fwd: Suggested Procedures For Collaborative Development Of OpenJUMP

2007-02-20 Thread Sunburned Surveyor
The makers of Kosmo have been in touch with me about participating in greater collaborative development of OpenJUMP, which I think is a great thing. Manuel has forwarded me a list of changes they have made to the OpenJUMP Core. I will make an effort this week to get a section on the JPP wiki that