I would suggest to remove the duplicates and the needless ones.
The unfolding of the star imports can be done later.
I'm willing to do this.
If you do the next JUMP/OJ merge rerun the script to find
out which new defects are introduced.
- Sascha
Stefan Steiniger schrieb:
> i have no concern.
>
>
i have no concern.
But I have to add, that I left the imports as they have been in the Jump
cvs, to avoid to much confusion when i do updates/sync with the original
Jump by Vividsolutions (using the eclipse diff tool). But as they don't
develop further since 5 months..
stefan
Sascha L. Teichm
Hi together,
I run a little script [1] against the source of OpenJUMP
to find out the improper use of 'import' statements.
Here's the result:
'*' import(s): 507
Star imports are name space polluters and should be better
written as a list of explicit imports. Star imports are
often used for
