Re: [JPP-Devel] About turning non-visible layer into non-editable

2016-10-18 Thread Michaël Michaud
Hi all, Thank you for your feedback, I made a second attempt to solve the problem in a more conservative way (r5083+). Instead of making invisible layers uneditable, I changed the method chooseEditableLayer used by most editing tools so that it does not choose invisible layers any more. Now

[JPP-Devel] SVN: [5083] core/trunk

2016-10-18 Thread jump-pilot-svn
Revision: 5083 http://sourceforge.net/p/jump-pilot/code/5083 Author: michaudm Date: 2016-10-18 19:16:56 + (Tue, 18 Oct 2016) Log Message: --- Second attempt to avoid editing invisible layers Modified Paths: -- core/trunk/ChangeLog core/trunk/src/com

Re: [JPP-Devel] About turning non-visible layer into non-editable

2016-10-18 Thread Stefan Steiniger
I think I somewhat agree with Jukka. I also look once in while what is underneath by shortly making it invisible... stefan On 10/18/16 09:56, Rahkonen Jukka (MML) wrote: Hi, I agree that it is logically good that non-visible layer is not editable because I can’t imagine a real world use ca

Re: [JPP-Devel] About turning non-visible layer into non-editable

2016-10-18 Thread edgar . soldin
On 18.10.2016 14:56, Rahkonen Jukka (MML) wrote: > Hi, > > > > I agree that it is logically good that non-visible layer is not editable > because I can’t imagine a real world use case where it would be better to > create features without seeing the other features of the layer. However, > som

[JPP-Devel] About turning non-visible layer into non-editable

2016-10-18 Thread Rahkonen Jukka (MML)
Hi, I agree that it is logically good that non-visible layer is not editable because I can't imagine a real world use case where it would be better to create features without seeing the other features of the layer. However, sometimes it is useful to switch the layer off and have a look under th

Re: [JPP-Devel] GvSIG better with GDAL than ImageIO-ext?

2016-10-18 Thread Rahkonen Jukka (MML)
Hi, It was a bit hard to find the sources but GvSIG-GDAL seems to be as an own project in http://devel.gvsig.org/svn/gvsig-gdal/ -Jukka- -Alkuperäinen viesti- Lähettäjä: edgar.sol...@web.de [mailto:edgar.sol...@web.de] Lähetetty: 18. lokakuuta 2016 11:00 Vastaanottaja: OpenJump develop

Re: [JPP-Devel] #431 Save project with unsaved layers

2016-10-18 Thread edgar . soldin
Mike, still trying to find the time to check and fix the underlying issue in JFCWithEnter properly.. please be patient ede On 17.10.2016 22:50, Michaël Michaud wrote: > Hi Ede, > > Let me know if you find something better to do with > > #431 Save project with unsaved layers > > Michaël > > >

Re: [JPP-Devel] GvSIG better with GDAL than ImageIO-ext?

2016-10-18 Thread edgar . soldin
On 18.10.2016 09:52, Rahkonen Jukka (MML) wrote: > Hi, > > > > I installed GvSIG 2.3.0.2447 final 64-bit on Windows. It opens both ECW and > JPEG2000 files very fast. GvSIG seems to be using the same GDAL binaries from > gisinternals.com than Ede has packed for OJ. Difference seems to be tha

[JPP-Devel] GvSIG better with GDAL than ImageIO-ext?

2016-10-18 Thread Rahkonen Jukka (MML)
Hi, I installed GvSIG 2.3.0.2447 final 64-bit on Windows. It opens both ECW and JPEG2000 files very fast. GvSIG seems to be using the same GDAL binaries from gisinternals.com than Ede has packed for OJ. Difference seems to be that GvSIG does not use imageio-ext but they have implemented someth