I agree with Ede:
Lets see if someone asks for a Java 5 version, before doing all the work.
thanks for all the work in the past weeks (did follow a bit via the list
- but my schedule, lately, is unfortunately full to do some
contributions :/ ).
stefan
Am 18.05.14 13:03, schrieb edgar.sol...@web
On 18.05.2014 15:43, Michael Michaud wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just found that OpenJUMP-CORE 1.7 is not java 5 compatible
> There is at least one reason due to a bad compiler option used
> to compile JTS 1.14 beta (my bad),
sh*t happens
>but there is also some other
> OpenJUMP classes using java 6 met
de attached.. couldn't find a proper translation for
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Map_coloring
so i left that untranslated. i guess german geo-buffs know what it means or
Stefan?
..ede
On 17.05.2014 17:34, Larry Reeder wrote:
> All,
>
> Can you give me help translating the strings for my map
Hi,
In OpenJUMP PLUS, I included a version of JGraphT 0.7 branch where
I backported a fix made in the 0.8 branch. This fix evaluates degree of
a LinearRing graph to 2 (correct) instead of 4 in the 0.7.3 version.
It seems there is still a bug I must investigate,
Finally not a bug. The version cur
Hi,
I just found that OpenJUMP-CORE 1.7 is not java 5 compatible
There is at least one reason due to a bad compiler option used
to compile JTS 1.14 beta (my bad), but there is also some other
OpenJUMP classes using java 6 methods like String.isEmpty().
Also I wonder how maven compile this code wi
Hi Larry,
I attached the french file,
And here are some further thoughts :
If we include it in PLUS version, we have to choose an appropriate
version of JGraphT as it is also used by the graph extension.
In OpenJUMP PLUS, I included a version of JGraphT 0.7 branch where
I backported a fix made in
