Re: [JPP-Devel] [ jump-pilot-Bugs-3613660 ] NPE on right-click a category

2013-05-22 Thread Michaël Michaud
Hi, >>> agreed on the "weird" functionality. but i guess that's rooted in OJ's >>> inability to set categories invisible as such. while imperfect i still >>> think users grasp it's functionality and will find use for it, or put >>> differently - better to have it than not. >>> >>> disagreed on y

Re: [JPP-Devel] [ jump-pilot-Bugs-3613660 ] NPE on right-click a category

2013-05-22 Thread edgar . soldin
On 22.05.2013 20:39, Michaël Michaud wrote: > Hi >> agreed on the "weird" functionality. but i guess that's rooted in OJ's >> inability to set categories invisible as such. while imperfect i still think >> users grasp it's functionality and will find use for it, or put differently >> - better to

Re: [JPP-Devel] new OJ release, 1.7. or 1.6.3

2013-05-22 Thread Michaël Michaud
Hi, > Ok, maybe a last word from Michael? OK, let's go for a 1.6.3. > I would go either way. But new features/functions (maybe more than 3) > would require 1.7. It does not match perfectly our versionning policy, but it seems a good compromise as we don't want to add the overhead of managing merge

Re: [JPP-Devel] [ jump-pilot-Bugs-3613660 ] NPE on right-click a category

2013-05-22 Thread Michaël Michaud
Hi, > ahh, i see.. forgot to commit changes to JUMPConfiguration, so my locally > working fix did not work in 3558. can i restore 3558 and add those? OK, it meets the first statement of my last mail, Just consider the option to add your changes over mine before reverting, Anyway, I would accomoda

Re: [JPP-Devel] [ jump-pilot-Bugs-3613660 ] NPE on right-click a category

2013-05-22 Thread Michaël Michaud
Hi > agreed on the "weird" functionality. but i guess that's rooted in OJ's > inability to set categories invisible as such. while imperfect i still think > users grasp it's functionality and will find use for it, or put differently - > better to have it than not. > > disagreed on your big rewor

Re: [JPP-Devel] new OJ release, 1.7. or 1.6.3

2013-05-22 Thread Giuseppe Aruta
It seems that Oj development is too much fast for a sequential number. I agree with Matthias. Giuseppe 2013/5/22 Stefan Steiniger > Ok, maybe a last word from Michael? > I would go either way. But new features/functions (maybe more than 3) > would require 1.7. > > Apart from that: Seems like a

Re: [JPP-Devel] new OJ release, 1.7. or 1.6.3

2013-05-22 Thread Stefan Steiniger
Ok, maybe a last word from Michael? I would go either way. But new features/functions (maybe more than 3) would require 1.7. Apart from that: Seems like at least for JPP/OJ democracy works ;) cheers, stefan Am 22.05.13 07:10, schrieb Matthias Scholz: > Am 22.05.2013 10:25, schrieb edgar.sol...@

Re: [JPP-Devel] new OJ release, 1.7. or 1.6.3

2013-05-22 Thread Matthias Scholz
Am 22.05.2013 10:25, schrieb edgar.sol...@web.de: > On 22.05.2013 10:17, Matthias Scholz wrote: >> Am 20.05.2013 21:01, schrieb edgar.sol...@web.de: >>> i want to push out the latest fixes. especially the oj_windows.bat fix. >>> >>> any way, as we also added some features and changed some menu item

Re: [JPP-Devel] [ jump-pilot-Bugs-3613660 ] NPE on right-click a category

2013-05-22 Thread edgar . soldin
ahh, i see.. forgot to commit changes to JUMPConfiguration, so my locally working fix did not work in 3558. can i restore 3558 and add those? ..ede On 22.05.2013 11:11, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: > agreed on the "weird" functionality. but i guess that's rooted in OJ's > inability to set catego

Re: [JPP-Devel] new OJ release, 1.7. or 1.6.3

2013-05-22 Thread Rahkonen Jukka
+1 for 1.6.3. -Jukka- Edgar Soldin wrote: > > On 22.05.2013 10:17, Matthias Scholz wrote: > > Am 20.05.2013 21:01, schrieb edgar.sol...@web.de: > >> i want to push out the latest fixes. especially the oj_windows.bat fix. > >> > >> any way, as we also added some features and changed some menu it

Re: [JPP-Devel] [ jump-pilot-Bugs-3613660 ] NPE on right-click a category

2013-05-22 Thread edgar . soldin
agreed on the "weird" functionality. but i guess that's rooted in OJ's inability to set categories invisible as such. while imperfect i still think users grasp it's functionality and will find use for it, or put differently - better to have it than not. disagreed on your big rework. granted i o

Re: [JPP-Devel] new OJ release, 1.7. or 1.6.3

2013-05-22 Thread edgar . soldin
On 22.05.2013 10:17, Matthias Scholz wrote: > Am 20.05.2013 21:01, schrieb edgar.sol...@web.de: >> i want to push out the latest fixes. especially the oj_windows.bat fix. >> >> any way, as we also added some features and changed some menu item >> locations, see >> http://jump-pilot.svn.sourceforge

Re: [JPP-Devel] new OJ release, 1.7. or 1.6.3

2013-05-22 Thread Matthias Scholz
Am 20.05.2013 21:01, schrieb edgar.sol...@web.de: > i want to push out the latest fixes. especially the oj_windows.bat fix. > > any way, as we also added some features and changed some menu item locations, > see > http://jump-pilot.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/jump-pilot/core/trunk/ChangeLog > we sh

[JPP-Devel] Apply button on Style Plugin

2013-05-22 Thread Giuseppe Aruta
Hi Michael, I like that "Apply" function you added on MultiInputDialog. It can have many other valid useful usages. thanks Peppe -- Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt New Relic is the only SaaS-based applica

Re: [JPP-Devel] new OJ release, 1.7. or 1.6.3

2013-05-22 Thread Giuseppe Aruta
+1 for me. These are my projects for next months, - I am going, in the next days, to add my raster tools (raster property plugin and pixel inspector) to OJ NB. I have to solve ony few issues. I will probabily add "Raster properties plugin" to Sextante Raster Context menu. - I want to add icons to