I use CVS for work, which is enough to make me a big subversion fan
:-) Atomic commits are the big thing I like, but I'm also a big of
sym-link support. That one isn't a big issue with this code base, I
imagine, but I like it anyways...
-Craig
-
Thanks Sunburned. I read the article linked to in Malte's post. I can see
where Subversion's atomic commit would be important in some environments,
but with the kind of service that I get from SourceForge, I would never get
anything done if I had to start over each time I got an error.
regards,
Malte,
Thanks for posting that link.
We've decided to stick with CVS for the time being. That is the versioning
control system that most of our developers are familiar with, and the
advantages of Subversion aren't great enough at this time to make the
switch. (Another great advantage of Subversi
Hello List,
I just found this weblog about this subject:
http://blogs.oracle.com/duffblog/2007/05/07#a411
By the way, I vote for Subversion although Netbeans support isn't as
good as Eclipse one.
I worked with both Systems and Subversion more intuitive for me.
But maybe I'm getting a more expe
