Stefan,
I'm a little confused. A List is an implemenation of the Collection
interface. I thought it would make more sense for the FeatureCollection
interface to return an implementation of Collection, rather than a List
specifically, becuase it gives the programmer implementing the interface
more
Ahh... sorry..
my fault. You are right!
I tried (very long time ago) the extension catalogue tool by Ugo and
uploaded some plugins just for testing. So I should check that and put
only those there that are still working.
thanx for pointing on that
stefan
Larry Becker schrieb:
> Stefan,
>
> S
Stefan,
Sorry, I assumed it was you. This is the comment from the Extensions Manager:
CataloguedExtension { SDE extension, ArcSDE plugin, LB, version: 1.2,
JUMP version: 1.1.2, description: 'A ArcSDE database reader for JUMP.
But i am not yet sure if it works - since i exlcuded this plugin fro
Hei Larry,
are you talking to me?
I am not sure what you mean. I have not done any change on the ArcSDE
Reader 2.0 plugin. It is still the one from August. Are you refering to
a problem with OJ 1.2 Beta?
..And none of them (plugin + OJ 1.2) is installable either???
lots of wondering ;o)
stefan
although you already respond with an ok.
i just want underline what Martin said, because a list has much more
features. and i guess alsmost everybody uses these nice features?
But It may be possible to add a second method - if one prefers to get a
collection :)
stefan
Sunburned Surveyor schrie
Roman,
It is going to be difficult for us to help you, as building an application
from OpenJUMP is quite a technical undertaking. I've read over the stack
traces from the exceptions you posted. I'll try to help by offering some
suggestions of things you can look at based on the information you've
