I've added some more thoughts about supporting plug-in dependencies to my
blog:
http://openjump.blogspot.com/
SS
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the c
I've given some quick thought to how we might solve our plug-in dependency
problem in OpenJUMP. I have written about it in my blog:
http://openjump.blogspot.com/
If your interested in this, please give me some comments. Will this work?
Why not? Is there a better way?
The Sunburned Surveyor
That's really Nice idea Sunburned Surveyor.
Go ahead.
On 2/22/07, Sunburned Surveyor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yup, I was going to include sound.
I suppose I could write transcripts...
Landon
On 2/22/07, Stefan Steiniger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> mhm.. you do not need to have an sound
Yup, I was going to include sound.
I suppose I could write transcripts...
Landon
On 2/22/07, Stefan Steiniger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
mhm.. you do not need to have an sound on the video?
just this moving cursor thing kind of video would be ok.. i think
stefan
Sunburned Surveyor schrieb:
Stefan,
Thank you. I will go through the list and try to determine which features
need to be documented since our last release.
Do you have an idea what translation work would need be done before our next
release?
Landon
On 2/22/07, Stefan Steiniger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
actually i can
actually i can not remember that i have done a list.
but if you look on the personal log on openjump.org
http://openjump.org/wiki/show/Done+List
you may trace back until the last official release date. It should be
also marked on the this list.
stefan
Sunburned Surveyor schrieb:
> Stefan
mhm.. you do not need to have an sound on the video?
just this moving cursor thing kind of video would be ok.. i think
stefan
Sunburned Surveyor schrieb:
> Before I do any work preparing videos on OpenJUMP use or development I
> thought I would get some comments from the other developers on the
Can you guys take a look at the Javadoc task from my Ant build file and tell
me if you can see a mistake with it? (The "javadoc directory" and "basic
classpath" references are defined earlier in the build file.) Ant appears to
cycle trough each source code generating the Javadoc, but when I look i
Stefan,
You had put together a list of new features that needed to be documented
before we can make the next OpenJUMP release. I've been searching through my
e-mail archives, but I can't seem to find that message. Do you still have
the list? If you do, would you be willing to send it to me again?
I guess too, this is the sense of having them separated.
I now at least someone who developed a gis-webservice (e.g. if you need
a buffer you simply send the geometry from your local program to the
service and it returns to you the buffer geometry), thus he does not
care about the gui functions.
Before I do any work preparing videos on OpenJUMP use or development I
thought I would get some comments from the other developers on the use of
the media type. I realize that the use of video instead of a traditional
"paper" document will present some translation difficulties.
Are there any othe
I have finally succeeded in building OpenJUMP from source, and having the
JAR files execute! I am very excited about this small accomplishment, which
turned out to be a real pain in the rear end.
I have modified the OpenJUMP Ant build file. This build file can be used by
developers that don't wan
Is it possible that JUMP/OpenJUMP is packaged in 2 separate JAR files to
allow developers to reference only the API JAR file when they need to use
JUMP's feature model, but aren't interested in the overhead of the workbench
classes?
I think I vaquely remember Jon mentioning this, and I was wonder
13 matches
Mail list logo
