On 20/09/14 02:34, Eric Snow wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Jesse Meek wrote:
We moved to GitHub in the hope of lowering the bar to contributors outside
the team. GitHub is *the* platform and process for open source software.
This was the logic behind the move. It was deemed to have t
I also suggested in another part of the thread sending an email when
a new request is submitted to all those invovled with the reviewing.
---
Regards,
Jonathan Aquilina
Founder Eagle Eye T
On 2014-09-19
23:14, Nate Finch wrote:
> If we automate the creation of reviewboard
reviews whenever a
Thats what im suggesting be it coding somethign from scratch or
adapting RB to make it much easier to work with.
---
Regards,
Jonathan
Aquilina
Founder Eagle Eye T
On 2014-09-19 23:01, Matthew Williams
wrote:
> At the risk of opening a can of worms:
>
> Reviewboard
doesn't have to be a ba
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 1:02 AM, Eric Snow wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 6:32 PM, David Cheney
> wrote:
>> There were three problem reviewboard was supposed to address, review
>> comments are sent immediately, no side by side diffs, and no way to to
>> chained proposals.
>
> It will be worth b
If we automate the creation of reviewboard reviews whenever a pull request
is made, it would make it trivial even for outsiders.
On Sep 19, 2014 5:01 PM, "Matthew Williams"
wrote:
> At the risk of opening a can of worms:
>
> Reviewboard doesn't have to be a barrier to contributing. We could allow
At the risk of opening a can of worms:
Reviewboard doesn't have to be a barrier to contributing. We could allow
new contributors/ drive by fixes to use github.
Matty
On 19 Sep 2014 17:05, "Eric Snow" wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Jonathan Aquilina
> wrote:
> > I am more than willin
juju-core 1.20.8
A new proposed stable release of Juju, juju-core 1.20.8, is now available.
This release may replace stable 1.20.7 after a period of evaluation. If
no issues are raised about this version, it will released on or after
September 24, 2014.
Getting Juju
juju-core 1.20.8 is availabl
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Jonathan Aquilina
wrote:
> I am more than willing to help out wity those modifications
Cool. I'll get in touch.
-eric
--
Juju-dev mailing list
Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
I am more than willing to help out wity those modifications
Sent from Samsung Mobile
Original message
From: Eric Snow
Date: 19/09/2014 5:41 PM (GMT+01:00)
To: juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com
Subject: Re: The Pros and Cons of ReviewBoard.
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Eric
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Eric Snow wrote:
> Given that I've in some part driven the switch to ReviewBoard, I want
> to make sure we are all on the same page and any decision on its
> future can be made objectively. This is an outgrowth of the current
> discussion on whether or not we shou
Given that I've in some part driven the switch to ReviewBoard, I want
to make sure we are all on the same page and any decision on its
future can be made objectively. This is an outgrowth of the current
discussion on whether or not we should ditch reviewboard.
Let's look at the pros and cons of u
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 6:32 PM, David Cheney
wrote:
> There were three problem reviewboard was supposed to address, review
> comments are sent immediately, no side by side diffs, and no way to to
> chained proposals.
It will be worth being extra clear on ReviewBoard's pros and cons.
I'll open a
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 6:11 AM, Gabriel Samfira
wrote:
> Just a suggestion:
>
> A git plugin similar to what Gerrit has would simplify things. For example,
> Gerrit has a nice little plugin called "Review". Simply doing:
>
> git review
>
> In your current branch would push the patchest to gerrit.
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Eric Snow wrote:
> I agree that reviewboard as we currently have it now adds extra work
> to our workflow. Not only does this impact the juju team, but it does
> add a stumbling block to more community involvement. However, my firm
> belief is that the real pain p
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Jesse Meek wrote:
> We moved to GitHub in the hope of lowering the bar to contributors outside
> the team. GitHub is *the* platform and process for open source software.
> This was the logic behind the move. It was deemed to have the most mindshare
> and we sacrifi
We will all be seeing each other in 2 weeks we can discuss it then
On Friday, September 19, 2014, Eric Snow wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 7:55 AM, Matthew Williams
> > wrote:
> > I do think it's too early to tell though. Why not give it another week
> or 2
> > then discuss in the cross teams
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 7:55 AM, Matthew Williams
wrote:
> I do think it's too early to tell though. Why not give it another week or 2
> then discuss in the cross teams if we want to keep it or not
+1
-eric
--
Juju-dev mailing list
Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 7:55 AM, Dimiter Naydenov
wrote:
> +1, In addition you can always check
> https://github.com/juju/juju/pulls to see what's in the queue. For
> sub-repositories it's the same, like
> https://github.com/juju/names/pulls. While I agree it's not all in one
> place, I tend to wo
You can use kanban for a unified view of reviews, but reviewboard is better
- you are able to see which reviews are missing comments and which ones are
approved but not landed without having to click through multiple windows.
Also the kanban board isn't viewable by everyone AFAIK.
Everyone else ha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 19.09.2014 16:44, Richard Harding wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Sep 2014, Nate Finch wrote:
>
>> There's one thing that hasn't been mentioned - reviewboard gives
>> us a unified review queue.
>
> Can I ask how kanban doesn't do this job for you? I've heard
On Fri, 19 Sep 2014, Nate Finch wrote:
> There's one thing that hasn't been mentioned - reviewboard gives us a
> unified review queue.
Can I ask how kanban doesn't do this job for you? I've heard this said a
couple of times but I realized the way I find out what needs to be looked
at is to go to
I don't yet have a strong opinion either way. I do think that since we
invested so much time in getting Review Board set up, we should use it for
a bit longer to see if these are growing pains.
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 7:11 AM, Gabriel Samfira <
gsamf...@cloudbasesolutions.com> wrote:
> Just a su
Just a suggestion:
A git plugin similar to what Gerrit has would simplify things. For example,
Gerrit has a nice little plugin called "Review". Simply doing:
git review
In your current branch would push the patchest to gerrit. Something similar for
RB, would probably simplify things a lot. Cha
Im more than willing to help improve the work flow for you guys. As well as
fixup issues you giys feel rb has
Sent from Samsung Mobile
Original message
From: Nate Finch
Date: 19/09/2014 1:32 PM (GMT+01:00)
To: Jonathan Aquilina
Cc: juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com
Subject: Re
There's one thing that hasn't been mentioned - reviewboard gives us a
unified review queue. On github you need to look in 8 places to see all
the stuff up for review, and anything not in juju/juju tends to get lost.
This is really important since that can have a big effect on our velocity.
I thi
Hey guys.
Long time lurker with the occasional suggestion.
I
have an idea for something that might be beneficial to the project as a
whole. Has it been considered about custom coding a review system that
will interface with github hooks and provide what is needed to all juju
dev's and keep t
Right now I'm a bit undecided, the usage of ReviewBoard is too fresh. But
Jesse made good points and in general Im always happy when we're using less
instead of using more tools. I can live with the number of mails, GMail
does grouping them fine. And I started to add my comments after a first
pass
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 19.09.2014 03:32, David Cheney wrote:
> There were three problem reviewboard was supposed to address,
> review comments are sent immediately, no side by side diffs, and no
> way to to chained proposals.
>
> I think that over the last few months we'
On 19 September 2014 01:32, David Cheney wrote:
> There were three problem reviewboard was supposed to address, review
> comments are sent immediately, no side by side diffs, and no way to to
> chained proposals.
>
> I think that over the last few months we've all learnt to live with
> the first i
On 19 September 2014 01:32, David Cheney wrote:
> There were three problem reviewboard was supposed to address, review
> comments are sent immediately, no side by side diffs, and no way to to
> chained proposals.
>
> I think that over the last few months we've all learnt to live with
> the first i
30 matches
Mail list logo
