On 01/22/2015 03:57 PM, Ryan Beisner wrote:
> Thanks for pointing out the yaml control file, that could be useful. But
> before we make any modifications to the OpenStack charms, I think it would
> be helpful to have an agreed-upon convention for the following in terms of
> Makefile target names:
On 05/01/2015 09:57 PM, Nate Finch wrote:
> you. Where is Juju documentation lacking? Where can we best spend our
> time to make the most impact?
>
Hello, Nate! :)
Although documentation improved drastically over the last 6 months, the
'reference manual' part is what I miss the most. For insta
Hi, lads (and ladies!)
I need to upgrade customer who's running juju 1.18 (on a fairly large
setup, 100+ nodes), and I'm not sure what's the proper procedure to do so.
I tried (in our lab, local OpenStack) upgrading juju-core package to
1.24, and then running 'upgrade-juju', but that just left my
Hi, Jose!
Probably there should be a 'introduction to maas' or 'maas by example'
which would help new users to get started with new MAAS cluster in KVM
virtual machines - I'm assuming not a lot of newcomers have several
bare-metal boxes lying around just to play with MAAS.
There is a very good bl
Hi, ladies and lads!
I am verifying the juju upgrade procedure and I ran into some
‘misunderstandings’ which I’m hoping could be clarified out here.
I am running juju 2.0.0 and the plan is to upgrade it to the latest 2.1
version, which is currently 2.1.3.
This is the procedure I followed:
I inn