Also for reference I have this paste that shows the debugging
information from the connection attempt
http://paste.ubuntu.com/6889001/
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 10:09 PM, Adam Stokes wrote:
> I read through the docs/api.txt to try and get an understanding of how
> to connect to juju's
? I went through some of the test
cases and attempted to decipher how that worked but now I'm a bit
stuck as to where to go next. The errors returned so far have just
been 403 forbidden.
Also, is this even the right place I should be for messing around with
RPC and juju? :)
Thanks!
--
[ Adam Stokes ]
--
Juju mailing list
Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
x27;Request': 'EnvironmentInfo'}
# ws.send(json.dumps(info))
except KeyboardInterrupt:
ws.close()
The library that Kapil uses in the jujuclient only supports hybi-13.
So I'm curious if juju supports anything beyond that?
--
[ Adam Stokes ]
--
Juju mailing list
Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
Got it working for anyone curious:
http://paste.ubuntu.com/6910254/
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Adam Stokes wrote:
> I tried a python3 variant that uses ws4py which is RFC 6455 compliant
> and can not seem to get the login to work:
>
> # OUtput
> connection opened
>
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Kapil Thangavelu
wrote:
> hybi-13 is the rfc version. the library jujuclient is using also has a
> python3 variant.
>
I guess my question is what version of the websocket spec is supported
in the juju api server? Any attempt to make a connection using a
websocket
code now as well:
ProtocolVersionHybi = ProtocolVersionHybi13
Do the latest libraries like go.net/websocket get pulled in during each release?
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 7:16 PM, Adam Stokes wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Kapil Thangavelu
> wrote:
>> hybi-13 is the
t;>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Brian Mullan
>> Raleigh NC
>>
>> --
>> Juju mailing list
>> Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
>>
>
> --
> Juju mailing list
> Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
>
--
[ Adam Stokes ]
--
Juju mailing list
Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
ts.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
--
[ Adam Stokes ]
--
Juju mailing list
Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
;
> On 07 Apr 2014, at 19:37, Adam Stokes wrote:
>
>> I think it would be cool if that was utilizing the existing code by
>> Kapil for the api interactions:
>>
>> https://launchpad.net/python-jujuclient
>
> Hi Adam,
>
> yeah, of course it would be nice.
ated a plugin, not sure why it was created again. It is
>> > over at Juju Plugins:
>> >
>> > https://github.com/juju/plugins
>>
>> I don't see anything equivalent or similar there.
>>
>> --
>> Francesco
>>
>>
>>
>>
are
definitely welcomed
--
[ Adam Stokes ]
--
Juju mailing list
Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
universe \
> | sudo tee -a /etc/apt/sources.list \
> && sudo apt-get update'
>
> 2014-04-23 15:07 GMT+09:00 Adam Stokes :
>> Handy plugin to capture a bunch of sosreport archives from X number of
>> machines in your juju environment.
>>
>
ect to allow this machine to make schema
>> changes. I'm running this test deployment with all services collapsed onto a
>> single machine, in case that's relevant.
>>
>> I believe I've changed the mysql config to allow this to happen. What is
>> the correct way to attempt to re-deploy a charm? Should I remove it and then
>> simply deploy again?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> QH
>
>
>
> --
> Juju mailing list
> Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
>
--
[ Adam Stokes ]
--
Juju mailing list
Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
> Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
--
[ Adam Stokes ]
--
Juju mailing list
Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
;
>
>
> --
> Juju mailing list
> Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
>
--
[ Adam Stokes ]
--
Juju mailing list
Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
an mullan wrote:
> It is the latest 1.18.3.1
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Adam Stokes wrote:
>>
>> Need to make sure you're using juju 1.18.3 or higher
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 1:16 PM, brian mullan
>> wrote:
>> > Kapil
>&g
Whats your environments.yaml look like?
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 3:46 PM, brian mullan wrote:
> Pasting a screen shot. if gmail coverts it incorrectly I have attached
> the screenshot as well
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Adam Stokes
> wrote:
>
>>
teries included. No extra charge :)
>
> Mark
>
> --
> Juju mailing list
> Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
--
[ Adam Stokes ]
--
Juju mailing list
Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
>>>> In about 11 minutes, we will go from zero to deployed infrastructure for
>>>> a scale-out blog (much like the one you're reading right now).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Juju mailing list
>>>> Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
>>>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>>>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Juju mailing list
>>> Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
>>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Juju mailing list
> Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
>
--
[ Adam Stokes ]
--
Juju mailing list
Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
Something else that would be cool is to submit your blog posts as a
tutorial on DO
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Adam Stokes wrote:
> There is also this:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1372543
>
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Charles Butler
> wrote:
&g
x27;t advance the machine to "deployed"? How
> do I track it down?
>
> Thanks.
> --
> Daniel Bidwell
>
>
> --
> Juju mailing list
> Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
--
[ Adam St
I'm looking to get my nodejs layer[1] included at
http://interfaces.juju.solutions and wanted to make sure that this charm
can be properly tested. I noticed that a Makefile is generated during
`charm-compose` and was curious how I can utilize that with amulet or
whatever the preferred way to test c
responsibility to just one thing, ie node layer
only installs node.js and exposes its installed state.
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Adam Stokes
wrote:
> I'm looking to get my nodejs layer[1] included at
> http://interfaces.juju.solutions and wanted to make sure that this charm
&
Hi,
I think my layer is ready for use
https://github.com/battlemidget/juju-layer-node I realize there is pending
changes to the actual composer names, aside from that could I get a review
on this and possibly added to http://interfaces.juju.solutions?
--
Juju mailing list
Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
Mo
of the system.
>
> Thanks,
> Ben
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 8:02 AM Adam Stokes
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think my layer is ready for use
>> https://github.com/battlemidget/juju-layer-node I realize there is
>> pending changes to the act
Started working on a nginx reverse proxy layer which can be found at
http://interfaces.juju.solutions/layer/nginx-proxy/
Source repo:
https://github.com/battlemidget/juju-layer-nginx-proxy
An example layer which makes use of it:
https://github.com/battlemidget/juju-layer-ircanywhere
It's all
If you're going to use Go or creating bindings of your own the api
documentation is https://godoc.org/github.com/juju/juju/api.
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 8:30 AM, André Moreira wrote:
> Thank you, Mark, for the reply.
> Nice to know there is this library and there will be an official one!
> But, if
on on what the functions do.
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 11:04 AM, André Moreira wrote:
> Hi Adam,
> What I mean is how do I construct the json requests and how should I
> expect the json response to be provided. Do you know where do I find this
> kind of documentation? I mean, is there
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
> On 05/11/15 00:19, André Moreira wrote:
> > Thank you, Adam. This is exactly what I was looking for.
> > André
>
> If you end up making bindings for another language like Ruby or Node
> then we'll be glad to publicise that to the communit
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Curtis Hovey-Canonical wrote:
> # juju-core 1.26-alpha1
>
> A new development release of Juju, juju-core 1.26-alpha1, is now available.
> This release replaces version 1.25.0.
>
>
> ## Getting Juju
>
> juju-core 1.26-alpha1 is available for Wily and backported to e
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Jorge O. Castro wrote:
> Happy Monday folks, here's the latest questions I've screened from our
> users that could use some love. Remember, you can subscribe to a tag
> to get an automated list of curated questions by hovering over the
> "juju" tag in the UI and cl
Im for it and the majority of my charm layers are py3 ready(ish).
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Cory Johns
wrote:
> https://github.com/juju-solutions/reactive-base-layer/issues/5
>
> I am for using Python 3 in the base layer, but we need to address the
> effect that would have on the charms c
Also there is a bzr library being utilized as well. Can we just extract
these out into subprocess calls instead?
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:07 PM, Stuart Bishop wrote:
> On 17 November 2015 at 03:50, Cory Johns wrote:
> > https://github.com/juju-solutions/reactive-base-layer/issues/5
> >
> > I
What if we only needed pure python modules? It seems like the toolchain
will always be installed because of some of the dependencies of
charmhelpers? Will these additional deps become optional once charmhelpers
is refactored?
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, 11:18 PM Marco Ceppi
wrote:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2
You can use `pip2` and it'll pull down the python 2.7 flask
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Merlijn Sebrechts <
merlijn.sebrec...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all
>
>
> Since shortly, Charm build creates Python3 Charms instead of Python2. I
> have a Charm that installs a Python2 application. It requir
I wanted to write this to get a discussion going around how we can better
support application developers. This is something I've been thinking about
for awhile and was further convinced to write this email after seeing posts
like:
http://askubuntu.com/questions/635758/is-juju-a-suitable-tool-for-de
aiting for the action to finish and show the result should be put
> in as a flag, with the possibility to become default in Juju2.
>
> - Juju 1: Add flag --wait
> - Juju 2: Make --wait default and add flag --no-wait
>
>
> What do you guys think? Is this what you had in mind, A
Also there seems to be a couple of bugs relevant to this discussion:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1445066
https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1445078
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Adam Stokes
wrote:
> I agree, having the ability to run actions synchronously and wait fo
Why would someone want to use this instead of what's provided in
charmhelpers?
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Stuart Bishop wrote:
> The Apt layer is more code broken out from my PostgreSQL charm work
> that will be used by future Cassandra charm work.
>
> It provides a simple, charms.reactiv
Cool thanks for the additional info, I'm going to integrate this into my
layers now
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Stuart Bishop wrote:
> On 28 January 2016 at 23:01, Adam Stokes
> wrote:
> > Why would someone want to use this instead of what's provided in
> >
You'll need to update your revisions in the bundle file. We ran into this
problem as well yesterday and it has to deal with charmhelpers regex when
matching package_names -> openstack_versions.
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 10:10 PM, Pshem Kowalczyk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've created my own openstack bundle
Currently, the only way to login to the Juju 2.0 api is to use the Tag of
'user-admin'. However, all the files created by juju during bootstrap
(accounts.yaml, models.yaml, controllers.yaml) only mention the admin user
as 'admin@local' for the controller.
When will the API login support logging in
Also, will the API support non admin users to login and query the various
modelmanager methods they have access to? If so, will this be available by
GA release?
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Adam Stokes
wrote:
> Currently, the only way to login to the Juju 2.0 api is to use the Tag
Thanks that makes sense now. I don't have aws or anything but what would
the admin user tag for those clouds look like?
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 7:07 PM, Andrew Wilkins <
andrew.wilk...@canonical.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 1:10 AM Adam Stokes
> wrote:
>
>>
r
> you bootstrap yourself are local to that controller.
>
> On 27/02/16 11:29, Adam Stokes wrote:
> > Thanks that makes sense now. I don't have aws or anything but what would
> > the admin user tag for those clouds look like?
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 7:0
t all
model related api code under modelmanager?
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 9:02 PM, Adam Stokes
wrote:
> Ok perfect, i'll try these tags out with the api. Thanks again
>
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 9:01 PM, Ian Booth
> wrote:
>
>> The admin user tag for aws is the same
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 7:24 PM, Tim Penhey
wrote:
> On 01/03/16 03:48, Adam Stokes wrote:
> > Is there a way to list all models for a specific controller?
>
> Yes.
Mind pointing me to the api docs that has that capability?
--
Juju mailing list
Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
Mod
29, 2016 at 8:46 PM, Ian Booth wrote:
>
>
> On 01/03/16 11:25, Adam Stokes wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 7:24 PM, Tim Penhey
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 01/03/16 03:48, Adam Stokes wrote:
> >>> Is there a way to list all models for a specific cont
>
> What are you wanting?
>
> You need a different API connection for each controller.
>
> Tim
>
> On 01/03/16 15:05, Adam Stokes wrote:
> > Right, but how do you specify which controller you want to list the
> > models for? The only way I can see is to manually `j
te APi for listing models for a given
> controller
> >> exists. But you do need to look at controllers.yaml to see what
> >> controllers you
> >> have bootstrapped or have access to in order to make the remote list
> >> models api
> >> call.
> >>
>
ther
> data.
>
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016, 8:37 AM Adam Stokes
> wrote:
>
>> One of the problems using `juju list-controllers --format yaml` versus
>> reading the controllers.yaml file directly is the information is
>> different. Specifically I need the UUID in order to
Not sure if this would help, but, I recently came across this
https://github.com/pantsbuild/pex. Would something like this help for
keeping charms self contained?
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016, 4:45 PM Cory Johns wrote:
> I'd like to raise awareness of the following issue open against
> charm-tools: https
Hi!
Could I get this bug added to the list too?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1554721
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Rick Harding
wrote:
>
>
> tl;dr
> Juju 2.0 beta3 will not be out this week.
>
> The team is fighting a backlog of getting work landed. Rather than get the
> partia
We are currently working a few kinks out to have a fully turnkey solution
for Nova LXD. The option already exist but there are a few rough spots that
we are fixing today.
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016, 10:07 AM Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
>
> Perhaps the best way to test these is with the new "conjure-up
>
Also we have conjure-up.io up and running as well.
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016, 10:09 AM Adam Stokes
wrote:
> We are currently working a few kinks out to have a fully turnkey solution
> for Nova LXD. The option already exist but there are a few rough spots that
> we are fixing today.
>
&
essive
> and will rule out many developer laptops.
>
>
>
> Best Regards
>
>
>
> Mark Baker
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Mark Shuttleworth
> wrote:
>
>> On 23/04/16 09:10, Adam Stokes wrote:
>>
>> Also we have conjure-up.io up and runn
ustin Kirkland
wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Mark Shuttleworth
> wrote:
> > On 23/04/16 09:35, Adam Stokes wrote:
> >> I don't think it's a hard rule it is just the hardware I have at the
> >> time. I'm fixing a few things today and will test
We've been using it with conjure-up and it works well for us.
On Sat, May 7, 2016, 1:56 PM James Beedy wrote:
> I have been testing out cs:xenial/ceph-0, and cs:xenial/ceph-osd-0, with
> no luck of getting either to deploy without error. Does anyone know the
> status of these charms?
> --
> Juju
ial/ceph-osd-0` succeed for you?
>
> On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 11:52 AM, ed bond wrote:
>
>> We tried for a week to get some bundles working with xenial-mitaka and
>> were having issues all over the place. Created some bugs, however was using
>> juju 1.25.
>>
>&g
Nice but this version is a bit crazy:
2.0-beta7~20160512~3966~0bd48e6f-20160512+3966+0bd48e6f~16.04
Maybe just drop -20160512+3966+0bd48e6f as it seems to be repetative
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 4:39 PM, Ryan Beisner
wrote:
> Absolutely <3 this.
>
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Nicholas Skag
l packages
Juju Enablement
juju experimental packages
juju-golang
juju packages
juju proposed packages
juju stable packages
Juju Staging
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Adam Stokes
wrote:
> Nice but this version is a bit crazy:
>
> 2.0-beta7~20160512~3966~0bd48e6f-20160512+3966+0bd48e6f~1
I believe he's using the LXD provider, here is the status output:
https://paste.ubuntu.com/16640152/
He's running into this issue:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1574844
According to the bug a fix is in process and should hopefully make it into
beta8
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 4:31 P
Just FYI, to workaround this issue until the above bug is fixed you can
just disable ipv6 on the host system (http://askubuntu.com/a/484487/59692)
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 4:39 PM, Adam Stokes
wrote:
> I believe he's using the LXD provider, here is the status output:
>
> https://pa
It looks like it still doesn't work, running
juju version
2.0-beta8.4022-xenial-amd64
I'm unable to juju to get a list of subcommands
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Nicholas Skaggs <
nicholas.ska...@canonical.com> wrote:
> Beta8 contains what I hope are some fixes for bash completion. It shou
For whatever reason I'm having a difficult time figuring out where the
upstream source code is for a charm that I wish to contribute to.
For example, going here: https://jujucharms.com/elasticsearch/trusty/15
What should I be looking for or clicking on that'll take me to a place
where I can begin
lease schedule until a GA release so now is the
perfect time to get involved and file bugs to help make this product the
go-to tool for deploying any and all big software. :)
Thanks,
Ubuntu Solutions Engineering Team
Adam Stokes, Mike McCracken, Daniel Westervelt
--
Juju mailing list
One thing (which I haven't done yet in some of my layers) is to place your
supervisorlib in `lib/charms/layer`. A nice first start though!
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 4:39 AM, Stuart Bishop
wrote:
> On 21 July 2016 at 10:40, James Beedy wrote:
>
> > I'll take all the input/feedback/criticism I can
looks good, one small nit pick, maybe change supervisorlib.py to just
supervisor.py. that seems to be the current naming scheme of things
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 1:42 PM, James Beedy wrote:
> A big thanks to those of you who gave feedback! I have made some revisions
> based on the suggestions I
Conjure-up is Juju 2.0, MAAS 2.0, and Xenial only. You will need to use
the previous openstack-installer if on trusty. Also if KVM is not
supported on power you'll need to use a different virt-type for
nova-compute.
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016, 6:23 AM John Meinel wrote:
> I don't know if conjure-up s
Nice! One question though maybe I'm missing something but I didn't see
where the conjure-up instructions were shown on the jujucharms.com page?
https://jujucharms.com/canonical-kubernetes/ It is in the README though
https://github.com/juju-solutions/bundle-canonical-kubernetes/blob/master/README.md
What is conjure-up?
Conjure-up lets you summon up a big-software stack as a “spell” - a model
of the
stack, combined with extra know-how to get you from an installed stack to a
fully usable one. Start using your big software instead of learning how to
deploy it.
How can you get it?
Xenial*:
$
This is very awesome!
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016, 12:07 PM Casey Marshall
wrote:
> With a much appreciated recent contribution from James Beedy (bdx) our
> Mattermost charm cs:~cmars/mattermost[1] is working again!
>
> This encouraged me to add some followup improvements to the charm to make
> it even
Odd it looks like the container has a read only file system? I ran through
a full openstack-novalxd deployment today and one of the upstream
maintainers ran through the same deployment and didn't run into any issues.
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016, 10:02 PM Heather Lanigan wrote:
>
> I used conjure-up to
I did have the openstack-novalxd
> bundle successfully deployed on it previously using juju 2.0_rc1.
>
> -Heather
>
> On Oct 20, 2016, at 11:30 PM, Adam Stokes
> wrote:
>
> Odd it looks like the container has a read only file system? I ran through
> a full opensta
This looks like it's due to the way we deploy OpenStack with NovaLXD in all
containers, this effectively breaks anyone wanting to do an all-in-one
install on their system.
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:22 AM Adam Stokes
wrote:
> So it looks like a recent change to the LXD charm,
Heather,
A bug has been filed about this issue:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/charm-lxd/+bug/1635659
I've asked that it get top priority in order to have this fixed pushed into
the charmstore asap. I'll let you know once the updated charm is available
for deployment again.
Sorry for the inconvenien
Nice, one thing you could do is tie this in with sosreport and just run
that against the machines. It already has support for juju, lxd, openstack,
etc.
https://github.com/sosreport/sos
And a list of all the plugins we support are here:
https://github.com/sosreport/sos/tree/master/sos/plugins
On
Just pulled in changes to support deploying The Canonical Distribution of
Kubernetes on the localhost cloud type.
I've blogged about it here:
http://blog.astokes.org/conjure-up-canonical-kubernetes-under-lxd-today/
Please give it a shot deploy some workloads on it and let us know how it
goes.
--
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 3:49 AM Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
Developers will love this, the ability to spin up k8s in multi-node mode
on a laptop is fantastic!
I wonder if it's worth providing a page of instructions for the sysctl
changes built-in to conjure-up?
Currently within the UI the user i
At least on the mobile site the install instructions are not properly
formatted (under getting started)
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016, 6:14 PM Jorge O. Castro wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm happy to announce that 1.5.1 is here, all charms have been pushed and
> it's ready to go. Please refer to this bl
Hey Brian
You'll want to use conjure-up for the localhost (LXD) as we provide some
alterations to the lxc profile that houses those charms.
On Sun, Jan 1, 2017, 2:26 PM brian mullan wrote:
> Environment:
>
> ubuntu 16.04 server VM (in kvm)
>
> 50GB disk
> 8 GB ram
> 4 cpu core
>
> I followed th
We have a feature coming in conjure-up that supports pinning and deploying
to specific machines if on MAAS. You can test this out by adding the
`ppa:conjure-up/daily-git` ppa and pressing the 'Architecture' button on
the charm deploy screen.
This will allow you to do 2 things:
1. Pin applications
Conjure-up is a power tool for getting started with big software.
Conjure-up lets you summon up a big-software stack as a “spell” - a model
of the stack, combined with extra know-how to get you from an installed
stack to a fully usable one. Start using your big software instead of
learning how to
Circling back around to this. Do we have an ETA or any updates on the
progress of interfaces.juju.solutions being folded into jujucharms.com?
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016, 11:20 AM Marco Ceppi
wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> We're aware of the outage and working to bring the service back online.
> This is un
https://github.com/juju/charmstore-client/issues/96
No one from that team has provided any additional input, even though I've
been asking and this is obviously a huge problem for users in general.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2017, 8:13 AM Merlijn Sebrechts
wrote:
> Hi all
>
>
> Uploading resources to the Ch
er\n\nApache/2.4.7 (Ubuntu) Server at
> api.jujucharms.com Port 443\n\n": invalid
> character '<' looking for beginning of value
>
>
>
> 2017-02-05 15:51 GMT+01:00 Adam Stokes :
>
> https://github.com/juju/charmstore-client/issues/96
>
> No one from that
Cross posting to juju lists. It is my understanding that if you add ceph
units to your juju environment or setup an NFS export that kubernetes can
make use of both of those. Someone from the containers team would know more.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 3:08 PM Eric wrote:
> That's is what I've also b
Thanks for the heads up, this is now fixed
$ sudo snap refresh conjure-up --beta
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 9:49 AM Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
> On 16/03/17 14:19, Curtis Hovey-Canonical wrote:
> > ## How do I get it?
> >
> > If you are running Ubuntu, you can get Juju from the juju stable ppa:
> >
conjure-up was merged into hombrew last night, please give the macOS
version a try and let us know if there are any issues:
brew install conjure-up
Thanks!
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 4:21 PM Curtis Hovey-Canonical
wrote:
> A new release of Juju, 2.2-beta1, and conjure-up, are here!
>
>
> ## What'
his.
>
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 6:56 AM Adam Stokes
> wrote:
>
> conjure-up was merged into hombrew last night, please give the macOS
> version a try and let us know if there are any issues:
>
> brew install conjure-up
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at
Hi All,
Before I get started I'd like to ask that you visit
https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/conjure-up-and-lxd-present-issues-and-future-resolutions/529
and
provide your feedback there.
In the conjure-up world we span multiple substrates to install big
software. One of the most popular substrate is
The details can be found here:
https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/snapd-2-26-9-and-conjure-up-no-longer-work/1348
I've pinged the snappy team and waiting to hear back on what the next
course of action is.
I'll send out another email once this issue is resolved.
Thank you for your patience
Adam
--
Juj
Follow up, if you haven't done a fresh install of Ubuntu (meaning you've
had a previous version of the snap core) you may be able to get around this
by running `sudo snap revert core` until a proper solution can be found.
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 8:27 PM Adam Stokes
wrote:
> The d
be updated and then
conjure-up will be right as rain.
Thank you for your patience and a big Thank you to the snappy team for
getting a fix out so quickly.
Adam
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 8:44 PM Adam Stokes
wrote:
> Follow up, if you haven't done a fresh install of Ubuntu (meaning you&#
Hi,
Could I get cs:~adam-stokes/dokuwiki-32 promulgated?
Thanks!
Adam
--
Juju mailing list
Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
Wahi,
https://conjure-up.io will allow you to do a full OpenStack deployment on a
single machine. Please have a look and see if that gets you what you want.
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:28 PM wahi wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am trying to find some tutorial or resources about installing
> Openstack u
, but it is not working with virtual machines, am
> I right ?
>
> On 08/10/2017 09:23 PM, Adam Stokes wrote:
>
> Wahi,
>
> https://conjure-up.io will allow you to do a full OpenStack deployment on
> a single machine. Please have a look and see if that gets you what you want.
&g
New dev summary is out!
http://blog.astokes.org/conjure-up-dev-summary-aws-cloud-native-integration-and-vsphere-3/
--
Juju mailing list
Juju@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
Hi David,
When to we expect the openstack-base bundle to be updated for the new
release?
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 5:48 PM David Ames wrote:
> Announcing the 17.08 release of the OpenStack Charms.
>
> In addition to 204 bug fixes across the charms and support for the
> Pike OpenStack release, the
99 matches
Mail list logo
