Re: errors in my juju deploy of canonical distribution of kubernetes

Just FYI... Just tried to use Conjure-up to deploy kubernetes-core following steps documented here: https://jujucharms.com/kubernetes-core/ That web page only instructs the user to install conjure-up with the command: $ *sudo apt install conjure-up* But the following command fails with error "

Re: master/CiaB: Wait for juju services to have open ports - Timeout when waiting for services

I found that when I "juju deploy" the services, the status of the service stuck at "(install) installing charm software" or other strange errors. [Units] ID WORKLOAD-STATE AGENT-STATE VERSION MACHINE PORTS PUBLIC-ADDRESS MESSAGE ceilometer/0unknown

Re: problem when building a charm for giraph

Hi Panagiotis, Thank you for the time and effort you put into this charm. We definitely need to look at the configuration properties you are suggesting and we should also consider the addition of an interface for injecting jars into Hadoop classpath. At this point you have two options for having

Re: problem when building a charm for giraph

+1 for an interface for injecting jars into Hadoop classpath. Also give us an interface do add additional config. It will speed up development of the Hadoop ecosystem charms a lot. I'd like to get Spark's dynamic resource allocation

Re: errors in my juju deploy of canonical distribution of kubernetes

On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 8:01 AM, brian mullan wrote: > *The kubernetes-core web page needs to instruct the user to add the > conjure-up/next ppa* > Fixed, thanks for the feedback! https://github.com/juju-solutions/bundle-kubernetes-core/pull/47 -- Jorge Castro Canonical Ltd. http://ubuntu.com/c

A new development release of Juju, 2.1-beta4, is here!

The Juju team would like to introduce Juju and conjure-up 2.1-beta4! ## What’s New Openstack Provider has been updated to support Neutron networking apis New APIs for querying instance types and characteristics available on clouds Model Migration is no longer behind a feature flag Instrumentat

Re: A new development release of Juju, 2.1-beta4, is here!

You will notice this is beta4 vs the rc1 we had been working toward. Part of 2.1 is an improvement to juju container networking that corrects issues that many users are facing. This updates Juju to only create bridges on a host machine only when a container is placed on the host and only for the s

Re: A new development release of Juju, 2.1-beta4, is here!

Some questions, because this sounds like something perfect for us. Does this work on MAAS or only openstack? Does this mean that I can put the constraint "has to be connected to network x" on an application and this will cause the container to be connexted to that network? Any more info/docs on

Check out OpenStack PDX

I'm a regular at the Openstack Meetup here in Portland, and am the only fellow repping Juju + Ubuntu Openstack. It would be really cool if people from Canonical who live in the northwest could show face at the Openstack Meetup too (if anything, so the juju community presence will be > 1). Find t

Re: Check out OpenStack PDX

Thanks James. I'll talk to my team and see if we can represent in the meetup. -Carlos On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 4:49 PM, James Beedy wrote: > I'm a regular at the Openstack Meetup here in Portland, and am the only > fellow repping Juju + Ubuntu Openstack. It would be really cool if people > from C

Re: A new development release of Juju, 2.1-beta4, is here!

On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 12:43 AM, Merlijn Sebrechts < merlijn.sebrec...@gmail.com> wrote: > Some questions, because this sounds like something perfect for us. > > Does this work on MAAS or only openstack? > > Does this mean that I can put the constraint "has to be connected to > network x" on an ap