Conjure-up does some things things in setting up pre-requisites for LXD so
that Kubernetes/Docker work as expected. In the next release we'll be
detecting these features and instead of having the applications error out,
be providing a more concise message as to why it's failed and how to
rectify.
Thx Marco... my concern was more for folks new to Canonical & following the
online instructions. .. only to see it error out..? Could sour them on
the juju approach.
On Jan 2, 2017 9:32 AM, "Marco Ceppi" wrote:
> Conjure-up does some things things in setting up pre-requisites for LXD so
> that
We have a feature coming in conjure-up that supports pinning and deploying
to specific machines if on MAAS. You can test this out by adding the
`ppa:conjure-up/daily-git` ppa and pressing the 'Architecture' button on
the charm deploy screen.
This will allow you to do 2 things:
1. Pin applications
I know current canonical-kubernetes deployes kubernetes in lxd containers
but will it eventually orchestrate lxd containers as an alternative to
Docker containers.
I know the desire for lxd support as an alternative to Docker has come up
multiple times on the kubernetes email list in the past year
We'd like to see K8s operate LXD containers too, but it's not on our
current cycle lists. I think if we focus on making LXD amazing, then
others will do the integration with K8s.
Mark
On 02/01/17 16:46, brian mullan wrote:
> I know current canonical-kubernetes deployes kubernetes in lxd
> contai
I started out installing openstack-base and then went back to add more
disks to be used for block storage. The default was /dev/sdb. I added
/dev/sda, /dev/sdc, and /dev/sdd via the juju gui, saved and deployed.
Nothing happened.
I just went in and partitioned /dev/sda, /dev/sdc, and /dev/sdd o
