Developers will love this, the ability to spin up k8s in multi-node mode
on a laptop is fantastic!
I wonder if it's worth providing a page of instructions for the sysctl
changes built-in to conjure-up?
We should aim to have the thing we socialize be one command ("conjure-up
canonical-kubernetes"
Awesome! Does this mean that running a Kubernetes cluster in LXD containers
on physical MAAS machines will also work?
2016-11-18 0:51 GMT+01:00 Adam Stokes :
> Just pulled in changes to support deploying The Canonical Distribution of
> Kubernetes on the localhost cloud type.
>
> I've blogged abou
On 18/11/16 09:29, Merlijn Sebrechts wrote:
> Awesome! Does this mean that running a Kubernetes cluster in LXD
> containers on physical MAAS machines will also work?
Hehe, good question :)
You would need to do some very careful network jiggling to line things
up across a cluster, but it would be
What you want Merlijn is LXC on Apache Mesos so you can provision a Mesos
cluster on MAAS and then provision Juju Charms into LXC on the infinitely
scalable cluster! Docker is cool but until it releases the proper
orchestration stuff, it comes a poor second to deploying workloads with
Juju ;)
That
Very happy to get the interfaces mirrorable, that's a great idea. I
think it's a pretty flat filesystem-style set of content.
Mark
On 12/11/16 17:43, Tom Barber wrote:
>
> Thanks for the update Marco.
>
> just to make sure people understand is inference in emails is awful.
> I'm not freaking out
Wait, wouldn't this require juju to have an "mesos" provider, so juju can
request lxc containers from mesos? I've heard something like this mentioned
at the Summit, will this become a reality? [that would be awesome!]
We want support for Docker containers because:
- A lot devs we work with create
I'll fork this so we're not hijacking another thread.
Mesos runs Mesos tasks via frameworks or Docker/Rocket containers
currently. Annoyingly they used to have a scriptable container endpoint I
was hoping to knock up a POC against but they removed it, and my C is
woeful so implementing it will tak
Oh also, if you ran your workloads on Mesos, you could mix LXC and Docker.
I guess people could add LXC support to K8S for the same outcome, either
way having a provider that could cope with that would be awesome.
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Tom Barber wrote:
> I'll fork this so we're not
On 18/11/16 11:27, Tom Barber wrote:
> Who said Mesos or DC/OS providers and charms wouldn't get official
> support? That said currently we're just lacking bandwidth to build
> them(I speak entirely as an impartial observer I have no real idea if
> they'd get Canonical support, but why not?) ;)
We
I'm mostly working with researchers and people developing early prototypes.
I can't blame them for using technologies that aren't production ready.
That said, I attended pragmatic docker days a while back and there were
some companies, like Yelp, who found a good way to run Docker in production
so
You mention stateless, thats fine, but for example, if you have sessions in
a web app, you'd need to share the sessions etc, so autoscaling isn't
really any different to juju add-unit except you've got some stuff to
monitor load and do it without user intervention. Also you'll find the flip
side to
2016-11-18 15:43 GMT+01:00 Tom Barber :
> You mention stateless, thats fine, but for example, if you have sessions
> in a web app, you'd need to share the sessions etc, so autoscaling isn't
> really any different to juju add-unit except you've got some stuff to
> monitor load and do it without use
A new development release of Juju, 2.1-beta1, is here!
## What's new?
* Controller instance size to have bigger default out of the box
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1638165
* Interactive add cloud
* Updates to "juju models" output
* Vsphere fixes
* Bug fixes https://launchpad.net/juju/+miles
Thank you guys!
Those folks who have access to VSphere, please do test this and file any
relevant bugs. A good clean bootstrap on VSphere is a fine way to start
every Kubernetes :)
Mark
On 18/11/16 19:05, Curtis Hovey-Canonical wrote:
> A new development release of Juju, 2.1-beta1, is here!
>
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
