Re: conjure-up Canonical Kubernetes in LXD

2016-11-21 Thread Adam Stokes
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 3:49 AM Mark Shuttleworth wrote: Developers will love this, the ability to spin up k8s in multi-node mode on a laptop is fantastic! I wonder if it's worth providing a page of instructions for the sysctl changes built-in to conjure-up? Currently within the UI the user i

Re: conjure-up Canonical Kubernetes in LXD

2016-11-18 Thread Merlijn Sebrechts
Wait, wouldn't this require juju to have an "mesos" provider, so juju can request lxc containers from mesos? I've heard something like this mentioned at the Summit, will this become a reality? [that would be awesome!] We want support for Docker containers because: - A lot devs we work with create

Re: conjure-up Canonical Kubernetes in LXD

2016-11-18 Thread Tom Barber
What you want Merlijn is LXC on Apache Mesos so you can provision a Mesos cluster on MAAS and then provision Juju Charms into LXC on the infinitely scalable cluster! Docker is cool but until it releases the proper orchestration stuff, it comes a poor second to deploying workloads with Juju ;) That

Re: conjure-up Canonical Kubernetes in LXD

2016-11-18 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
On 18/11/16 09:29, Merlijn Sebrechts wrote: > Awesome! Does this mean that running a Kubernetes cluster in LXD > containers on physical MAAS machines will also work? Hehe, good question :) You would need to do some very careful network jiggling to line things up across a cluster, but it would be

Re: conjure-up Canonical Kubernetes in LXD

2016-11-18 Thread Merlijn Sebrechts
Awesome! Does this mean that running a Kubernetes cluster in LXD containers on physical MAAS machines will also work? 2016-11-18 0:51 GMT+01:00 Adam Stokes : > Just pulled in changes to support deploying The Canonical Distribution of > Kubernetes on the localhost cloud type. > > I've blogged abou

Re: conjure-up Canonical Kubernetes in LXD

2016-11-18 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Developers will love this, the ability to spin up k8s in multi-node mode on a laptop is fantastic! I wonder if it's worth providing a page of instructions for the sysctl changes built-in to conjure-up? We should aim to have the thing we socialize be one command ("conjure-up canonical-kubernetes"

Re: conjure-up Canonical Kubernetes in LXD

2016-11-17 Thread Antonio Rosales
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Charles Butler wrote: > This deserves a ton of fanfare. Let's celebrate this win by circulating this > like crazy. > > I've already retweeted this evening and plan on following up again tomorrow > during normal business hours. Great work Stokes on completing this

Re: conjure-up Canonical Kubernetes in LXD

2016-11-17 Thread Charles Butler
This deserves a ton of fanfare. Let's celebrate this win by circulating this like crazy. I've already retweeted this evening and plan on following up again tomorrow during normal business hours. Great work Stokes on completing this herculean task. The ~containers team, appreciates the effort that

conjure-up Canonical Kubernetes in LXD

2016-11-17 Thread Adam Stokes
Just pulled in changes to support deploying The Canonical Distribution of Kubernetes on the localhost cloud type. I've blogged about it here: http://blog.astokes.org/conjure-up-canonical-kubernetes-under-lxd-today/ Please give it a shot deploy some workloads on it and let us know how it goes. --