On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 5:38 AM, Adam Stokes wrote:
> Circling back around to this. Do we have an ETA or any updates on the
> progress of interfaces.juju.solutions being folded into jujucharms.com?
Indeed some work we would like to kick off and have scheduled for this
Ubuntu 17.04 cycle. Currentl
Circling back around to this. Do we have an ETA or any updates on the
progress of interfaces.juju.solutions being folded into jujucharms.com?
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016, 11:20 AM Marco Ceppi
wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> We're aware of the outage and working to bring the service back online.
> This is un
Very happy to get the interfaces mirrorable, that's a great idea. I
think it's a pretty flat filesystem-style set of content.
Mark
On 12/11/16 17:43, Tom Barber wrote:
>
> Thanks for the update Marco.
>
> just to make sure people understand is inference in emails is awful.
> I'm not freaking out
As an update http://interfaces.juju.solutions/ is back up.
-thanks
Antonio
On Saturday, November 12, 2016, Tom Barber wrote:
> Thanks for the update Marco.
>
> just to make sure people understand is inference in emails is awful. I'm
> not freaking out or complaining about the outage this stuff
Thanks for the update Marco.
just to make sure people understand is inference in emails is awful. I'm
not freaking out or complaining about the outage this stuff happens, more
just offering mirror support etc should it be seen as a good course of
minimising outage.
Tom
On 12 Nov 2016 17:19, "Mar
Hey everyone,
We're aware of the outage and working to bring the service back online.
This is unfortunate, but we're in the process of getting the
interfaces.juju.solutions site, folded into the charm store properly. This
service has done it's job in providing the initial indexing but as we see
to
I don't really think Mark is going to do one, my point is that for
platforms like this to survive if they depend on central services for
build/running etc, the services shouldn't just be maintained by a single
entity.
HA sure will solve some issues but I also think that distributing ownership
also
Here's something thats been troubling me for a while, Canonical are the
single point of failure with juju. For example, this morning
interfaces.juju.solutions appears to be offline, thats not the end of the
world but of course I can't download layers from it.
I entirely second this. Interfaces.juj
Here's something thats been troubling me for a while, Canonical are the
single point of failure with juju. For example, this morning
interfaces.juju.solutions appears to be offline, thats not the end of the
world but of course I can't download layers from it.
Similarly, if Mark for whatever reason
