Hey Philip,
I was negligent in updating the bug, so I apologize. Here's an update: I had to
fix a few other things before I could land a proper fix. Since yesterday, I
have once again been working on this. I'm planning on landing a fix by tomorrow
which should make the cut for beta16, also to b
Do we have an update on when this bug will be fixed as this is required
for OSM release 1.
Regards,
Philip
On Thu, 2016-08-18 at 15:38 +, Rick Harding wrote:
> > Thanks Adam, that's in flight and I'll make sure to reach out once
that lands.
>
> > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:00 AM Adam Israel
Just to provide a little more clarity on the Azure issue.
The recent Azure SDK update changed the Azure behaviour as exposed to Juju. We
were previously not waiting for machines to be marked as fully provisioned; the
SDK now does this for us. MS says this is what you must do. The effect on Juju
is
For those wanting something newer, don't forget you also have daily builds
via the edge channel of the juju snap.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Rick Harding
wrote:
> Thanks Adam, that's in flight and I'll make sure to reach out once that
> lands.
>
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:00 AM Adam Isr
Thanks Adam, that's in flight and I'll make sure to reach out once that
lands.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:00 AM Adam Israel
wrote:
> Hi Rick,
>
> We have a need for the daily build with this fix in place:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1611514
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016
Hi Rick,
We have a need for the daily build with this fix in place:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1611514
Thanks!
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 9:26 AM Rick Harding
wrote:
> We need to delay the release of beta16 until next week as we've been busy
> breaking things and currently don't h