Re: Storage Subordinate / Interface

2016-09-13 Thread Adam Collard
How will this new charm relate to the existing storage charm ? On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 at 09:27 Samuel Cozannet wrote: > +1, this would open up a cheap option to add resilient storage between > deployments by reusing data volumes, or even cross model data sh

Re: Storage Subordinate / Interface

2016-09-13 Thread Samuel Cozannet
+1, this would open up a cheap option to add resilient storage between deployments by reusing data volumes, or even cross model data shares. If the list of backends can be extended to include: * NFS / EFS * EBS * Google Persistent Volumes * Azure Storage then +10 ++ Sam -- Samuel Cozanne

Re: Storage Subordinate / Interface

2016-09-12 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
On 12/09/16 15:08, Chris MacNaughton wrote: > Any interest in something like this? Hell yes :) -- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju