+1
This sounds really interesting. Keep me apprised, please? I'd love to see
if there's some integration work we can do here (on top of the
kubernetes => mesos integration)
Charles Butler - Juju Charmer
Come see the future of modeling your datacenter: http://jujucharms.com
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016
OMGOMGOMG
2016-11-24 16:47 GMT+01:00 Tom Barber :
> Okay, it transpires some of my Java guys also know C who knew.
>
> Anyway, they have been tasked with adding LXC/LXD support to Apache Mesos
> which we'll push upstream assuming they want it. My plan is to then extend
> Marathon to support
Okay, it transpires some of my Java guys also know C who knew.
Anyway, they have been tasked with adding LXC/LXD support to Apache Mesos
which we'll push upstream assuming they want it. My plan is to then extend
Marathon to support LXD deployments and from that we'll then build a Juju
provide
2016-11-18 15:43 GMT+01:00 Tom Barber :
> You mention stateless, thats fine, but for example, if you have sessions
> in a web app, you'd need to share the sessions etc, so autoscaling isn't
> really any different to juju add-unit except you've got some stuff to
> monitor load and do it without use
You mention stateless, thats fine, but for example, if you have sessions in
a web app, you'd need to share the sessions etc, so autoscaling isn't
really any different to juju add-unit except you've got some stuff to
monitor load and do it without user intervention. Also you'll find the flip
side to
I'm mostly working with researchers and people developing early prototypes.
I can't blame them for using technologies that aren't production ready.
That said, I attended pragmatic docker days a while back and there were
some companies, like Yelp, who found a good way to run Docker in production
so
On 18/11/16 11:27, Tom Barber wrote:
> Who said Mesos or DC/OS providers and charms wouldn't get official
> support? That said currently we're just lacking bandwidth to build
> them(I speak entirely as an impartial observer I have no real idea if
> they'd get Canonical support, but why not?) ;)
We
Oh also, if you ran your workloads on Mesos, you could mix LXC and Docker.
I guess people could add LXC support to K8S for the same outcome, either
way having a provider that could cope with that would be awesome.
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Tom Barber wrote:
> I'll fork this so we're not
