...
>
> And now I think of it, can I stream resources? I don't want to
> provision a machine with 8TB of storage just so I can restore a 4TB
> dump. Maybe this is just a terrible example, since I probably couldn't
> be bothered uploading the 4TB dump in the first place, and would
> instead setup t
Thanks - I tried the bundle on Local and AWS – but I get similar errors on both
- hook failed: "etcd-relation-changed"
Local -
unit-kubernetes-0[895]: 2016-02-17 05:56:46 INFO
unit.kubernetes/0.etcd-relation-joined logger.go:40
subprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['scripts/bootstrap_docker
You have to "charm" that portion up. At the moment we don't have a NetApp
cinder backend charm, but we do have some examples of how to implement a
cinder backend. One example of this is the cinder-vnx charm (
https://jujucharms.com/u/marcoceppi/cinder-vnx/trusty/4) using the latest
version of charm
Hi,
I'm looking at building an openstack cluster that uses NetApp for storage.
Having a look at cinder charm I don't see a way to specify a driver (or any
additional parameters). What's the recommended way of using 3rd party
storage drivers with openstack charms. The doc I'm working off is here:
h
On 17 February 2016 at 01:20, Katherine Cox-Buday
wrote:
> My understanding is that it's a goal to make the management of units more
> consistent, and making the units more homogeneous would support this, but
> I'm wondering from a workload perspective if this is also true? One example
> I could
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 at 18:40 Katherine Cox-Buday <
katherine.cox-bu...@canonical.com> wrote:
> Thanks, Adam.
>
> Playing devil's advocate to my own question here: why isn't this 1 charm
> broken up into separate charms that handle the different bits of the
> workflow? It sounds like you'd want to
Thanks, Adam.
Playing devil's advocate to my own question here: why isn't this 1 charm
broken up into separate charms that handle the different bits of the
workflow? It sounds like you'd want to break this up into different
charms along lines of modeled responsibility and then deploy using bun
Hi Katherine,
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 at 18:20 Katherine Cox-Buday <
katherine.cox-bu...@canonical.com> wrote:
> The team is looking closely at some of our CLI surrounding resources, and
> an interesting question came up: should units be considered homogeneous?
>
> My understanding is that it's a go
Hey All,
The team is looking closely at some of our CLI surrounding resources,
and an interesting question came up: should units be considered homogeneous?
My understanding is that it's a goal to make the management of units
more consistent, and making the units more homogeneous would support
I just want to say that I ran GSoC for my side open source project a couple
of years ago and it was really awesome. I worked to setup standup meetings,
a kanban board, and did things like code reviews and such. So this is
something, that if folks are interested, can be really useful as far as
mento
Hello everyone!
I just wanted to let you know that we as Ubuntu are planning on running
as an organization for Google Summer of Code. This is a program where
university students from all around the world help with open source
organizations.
However, for this to happen, we need to have mentor
Hi everyone,
Here are our notes from reviewing charms on the 11th of Feb. Many thanks to
Cory, Kevin and Andrew.
-
apache2
-
https://code.launchpad.net/~evarlast/charms/trusty/apache2/trunk/+merge/278220
-
Multiple tests still failing (though maybe unrelated to th
Hi Ramsey,
If your goal is to setup a single NUC Openstack I would also suggest
taking a look at our Openstack installer. It supports a single install
option that utilizes a combination of LXC/KVM and will soon support the
solution Mark described below with LXD on Xenial.
Details can be foun
Thanks for the quick response Nick and Mark :)
Installing Xenial is definitely plausible. FWIW, I purchased this NUC
for the sole purpose of setting up a self hosted cloud to build software.
I'll find a USB stick and install Xenial ASAP and give the 2.0 a shot.
I'll either be back with more q
Yup makes a lot of sense, it is similar to a conversation me and Marco
discussed briefly on the final night, where you might want to launch a
"development" Big Data quickstart profile where you don't actually launch 5
machines but instead just spin up a bunch of containers over 1 or 2 boxes
and the
On 15/02/16 12:58, Tom Barber wrote:
> In an alternative world, it would be great to be able to extend these
> locally so when Amazon or whoever launch new instance types we could have a
> local instance-types.yaml file or something that lets us declare new node
> types without waiting for a new ju
Greetings Akhil,
This is an unfortunate issue. This looks like its affecting the older work
we've published upstream into the kubernetes repository.
Are you working on developing Kubernetes core and would like to use juju to
stand that up? If not I would like to recommend you take a look at our
n
On 16/02/16 12:47, Nick Veitch wrote:
> It is also worth pointing out that the upcoming Juju 2.0 release has much
> better local provider support as it uses LXD, and if you are just
> experimenting, it may be better for you to try that!
> There are details on installing the Juju 2.0 alpha here:
> h
Hi Ramsey,
Sorry you haven't had a good start. With your setup and needs, I would
follow the documentation at
https://jujucharms.com/docs/stable/getting-started
Install Juju as described and then set up for a local environment with the
instructions here:
https://jujucharms.com/docs/stable/config-
19 matches
Mail list logo
