Re: Charmers application

It sure took you long enough to apply Cory! You almost get a negative one from me just on waiting so long! My vote is +1 on Cory. His anchor tells me he is very good at documentation, and we need all the help on docs that we can get! Welcome aboard Cory. - Matt Bruzek On Fri, Aug 7, 2015

[Review Queue] db2

I reviewed the IBM DB2 charm today. This is another charm that requires a lot of error prone setup before it will deploy, such as downloading the binary and hosting it on a web server. This will be very hard for customers to accept when they have mysql or postgresql that deploy directly from Juju

[Review Queue] IBM Java SDK

-1 IBM Java SDK - https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/1477067 The charm is progressing nicely as a first iteration, there is still some cleanup to be done here around the charm project files, and the comprehensive amulet testing. Charles Butler - Juju Charmer Come see the future of datacent

Re: Charmers application

What to say about the charmer application from a person who helped author now two different charm frameworks, countless Big Data charms in the ecosystem, and a contributor to many of the ecosystem tools? I think Cory instills the key tenants of a charmer and understands the core charm store concep

Re: Charmers application

I +1 this application, with the highest of +1 thumbs. It has been a pleasure working with Cory to complete the Big Data ecosystem during the review process, and working with his contributions to the charming developer story w/ his plugins: juju-sync-watch and juju dhx Congrats Cory! Charles But

Re: Fwd: How to do network segregation with Juju deployment ?

Does the --networks=... actually bring up the maas nodes? That would be simpler then doing "juju machine add ..." going in and bringing up the interfaces and then doing "juju deploy --to n". On Fri, 2015-08-07 at 18:52 +0300, Dimiter Naydenov wrote: > Hi, > > We're in currently developing m

Fwd: Re: Charmers application

Cory has done a lot to improve the developer experience and has shown an extensive breadth of knowledge about Juju and its ecosystem. He has a +1 from me. On 2015-08-07 12:29 PM, Cory Johns wrote: > Dear Charmers, > > I would like to apply for membership to https://launchpad.net/~charmers > > I

Juju supported 1.22.7 is proposed

# juju-core 1.22.7 A new proposed supported release of Juju, juju-core 1.22.7, is now available. This release may replace version 1.22.6 on Thursday August 13. The 1.20.x series of Juju is supported, though it is an older version than the current stable version. The current stable of juju is 1.24

Charmers application

Dear Charmers, I would like to apply for membership to https://launchpad.net/~charmers I have worked on the current set of Big Data charms and bundles, Cloud Foundry charms , and several other smaller charms. I also tr

Re: Fwd: How to do network segregation with Juju deployment ?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, We're in currently developing more comprehensive networking features in Juju, so soon you'll be able to configure this with Juju the way you like it. In the meantime, please ignore the --networks argument - it was implemented partially as a proof

Re: Juju and TOSCA

Thanks for these details Melijn, So you want to be able to describe a topology without deploying it, and you also want to be able to record that topology so that it can be reused. Both of these are good ideas, and the juju concept that supports both of these at once is called "stacks". It's not y

Re: Juju and TOSCA

Gustavo Thank you for your response. I'll explain two TOSCA concepts I find very interesting and would like to use in Juju. # Separation of Topology VS Plans. In TOSCA, you can define a topology (what services you want and how to connect them) independent from Plans (How to implement these ser