Re: Trying out the services framework. Is this a bug or a feature?

Hi Merlijn, I posted an example of the workaround I developed this week while rewriting a charm to use the services framework. I am working on a fix for the bug, but in the meantime you can use this: http://askubuntu.com/questions/602527/provide-data-doesnt-send-data-when-required-keys-not-satisf

Re: What's the future of Juju?

Hi, Thanks for the useful feedback on docs! I agree that good examples for Python and the charm helpers are things that are sorely missing, and we will address that soon. I don't want to burden you further, but would you mind if I emailed you some questions about your experience with the documentat

Re: Trying out the services framework. Is this a bug or a feature?

Hi Merljin, It indeed is a bug. I'm working on a fix for that. I just landed but I'll post an example workaround tonight, when I get home. Adam > On Mar 28, 2015, at 4:05 PM, Merlijn Sebrechts > wrote: > > I put the question on askubuntu: > > https://askubuntu.com/questions/602527/provide-d

Re: What's the future of Juju?

Thanks to everyone for taking the time to answer this so thoroughly! The project is clearly going in a direction that will be very beneficial to us. The monitoring, multi-user and cross-platform features will come in very handy! I do agree with Mark that "writing charms has been poorly documented"

Trying out the services framework. Is this a bug or a feature?

I put the question on askubuntu: https://askubuntu.com/questions/602527/provide-data-doesnt-send-data-when-required-keys-not-satisfied-juju-charm-usin tl;dr: You can't seem to use the same relationship class for both provided_data and required_data... Am I using this completely the wrong way? -

[Review Queue] AppScale, IBM MQ, IBM GPFS, Ubuntu, RabbitMQ

New Charm AppScale. https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/1424335 The charm overall looked good, and deployed as described. I had a few small suggestions, however I recommeded this one to be accepted into the charm store. New Charm IBM MQ https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/1432489 Working wi

Re: New Docker goodies

Thanks. :-) I do hope we can also to get local provider working inside the container as well, since it will provide a cleaner set of instructions for new charmers to test their charms, or just play around with Juju. But the --net=host workaround gives us immediate wins in CI, review, and developm

juju ssh key

Hi, How do i create a juju ssh key for superuseradmin and upload it to the maas controller? Best, Stephen -- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju

commissions are failing

Hi, The pxe boots seem to work up to a certain point, I have not set up the ssh public key. How do I do that? Is the public key just from the same machine the superuseradmin was created on? Im getting a failed to query node BMC. Does a loopback need to be disabled or something else? Cheers, S

Re: New Docker goodies

On 27 March 2015 at 23:50, sheila miguez wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Jorge O. Castro wrote: >> >> let's you just try Juju, with the limitation that you can't do the >> local provider. > > > I definitely appreciate the ability to test something isolated from my > system. I was try