On Apr 23, 3:45 pm, Adam wrote:
> > That sounds like a potential accessibility issue.
>
> I certainly think so, hence the question :]
>
Why can't you just include the content from the server?
If the goal is to have the information when the page loads, send it in
the initial request. Bots will
On Mar 9, 3:43 am, phipps_73 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have just upgraded one of our development sites to 1.3.2 and ui 1.7.
> I have also updated all of the plugins
> (forms,validate,thickbox,calculation,blockUI,autogrow) to the latest
> versions which should all be compatible with 1.3.2 and the site
On May 5, 1:53 pm, Matt Kruse wrote:
> On May 5, 3:38 pm, kiusau wrote:
>
> > QUESTION: If a lone pair of parentheses can be used to automatically
> > call a function, then what does it mean when two pairs are juxtaposed
> > in the same statement as follows: ()(jQuery);?
>
> See, this is pur
On May 13, 1:29 pm, Peter Warnock wrote:
> [ ] is an array literal, like { } is an object literal.
>
> var obj = json[0];
>
> You shouldn't useevalon JSON. If you specify 'json' as your return
> type, jQuery will safelyevalvalid JSON.
>
jQuery uses what ECMA 262 calls "indirect eval".
window
On Apr 14, 8:58 am, Klaus Hartl wrote:
> On 14 Apr., 15:41, MorningZ wrote:
>
> > So what is the error
>
> The error is obviously that toDate is not a jQuery method. Another
Right.
> problem is that that Dreamweaver method is using document.write which
> can cause a problem depending on wher
On Apr 14, 9:34 pm, sneaks wrote:
> hi! i am trying to use jQuery.post() to send name/value to a php
> function which then retreives data from mysql and responds with JSON
> which looks like this when i append it directly to my debug output
> div:
>
[...]
> i have tried to iterate through the
On Apr 15, 4:34 pm, sneaks wrote:
[posting order restored]
> On Apr 15, 1:28 pm, dhtml wrote:
>
> > On Apr 14, 9:34 pm, sneaks wrote:
>
> > > hi! i am trying to use jQuery.post() to send name/value to a php
> > > function which then retreives data
On Apr 15, 7:33 pm, sneaks wrote:
> for anyone having similar problem heres how i resolved it:
>
> function getProductInfo(product_id) {
> jQuery.post(
> "/wp/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php", {
> action: "getProductInfo",
On Apr 16, 12:42 am, mkmanning wrote:
> Just an FYI, but there's no 'object side' of the json in your example.
> It just an object, consisting of name-value pairs. While you can leave
No, it is not an object. It is a string.
> quotes off of the names, they are strings which, according to the
On Apr 16, 12:28 pm, redsun wrote:
> i'm sure the jQuery i'm using below is very ineffiecient. the only
I would not doubt that it is inefficient (you are using jQuery).
> syntax that changes are the numbers in the names of my IDs and my
> variables - and even they're matching. everything else
On Apr 16, 5:14 pm, mkmanning wrote:
> As I said before: it's a string until it's eval'd, which happens with
> the 'json' response type within jQuery, or as I said you can eval the
Notice carefully what 'sneaks' used for his dataType:
jQuery.post(
"/wp/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php", {
On Apr 14, 3:34 pm, Ricardo wrote:
> If you insert these attributes server-side, the page will not validate
> and might trigger quirks mode in the browser.
Which browser?
Thanks,
Garrett
On Apr 17, 10:55 am, mkmanning wrote:
> >- the dataType is "JSON", not "json".
> >(I pointed this out earlier in this thread)
>
> I noticed what sneaks did, I also noticed you had pointed it out,
> which is why my comment was in direct reply to sneaks post about the
> 'object side' and removing
On Apr 23, 12:13 pm, hedgomatic wrote:
> While virtually every site in existence trumpets using the jQuery DOM-
> ready shortcut as an absolute must, I've come across situations which
> I feel frustrate the user, particularly when using jQuery to create a
> navigational element.
>
That sounds
14 matches
Mail list logo
