I've got a page set up where it loads each image on the page, one
after the other. As you can see here:
http://sandbox.exit42design.com/photography/folio_1.html
The problem with this is that if one of the images is broken, it'll
stop in it's tracks and not try to load the next.
Here's an exampl
On Feb 3, 6:15 pm, Karl Rudd wrote:
> You could try using the "error" handler:
>
> $(image[1]).bind('error', function(){ /* ... */ });
>
> I believe it works for all the common browsers.
>
> Karl Rudd
Thanks Karl, that works fantastically! As you can see here now, it
just skips over the brok
> I'd try to avoid writing a routine explicitly for each image and
> instead use a loop. This is thoroughly untested.
Thanks a ton Brian for the help with that code, I had no idea you
could load an array like that! The loops were helpful as well, I used
the "each" loop on the image object array t
On Feb 4, 11:20 am, brian wrote:
> Yeah, I thought it didn't look right. Even doing it with each() like
> that . It's too bad one can't create an Image oject with with both the
> dimensions and the src.
Well the other factor is that I want the images to load in succession
as opposed to all at on
Hi all, I'm desperate for a solution to a major performace problem
I've got.
Basically, I'm trying to do something along the lines of what was done
here with Flash: http://karankapoor.com/
I've got the image centering and scaling worked out. The problem is
when I try to do a dissolve between im
Upon further investigation, it's the Mac Firefox that's giving me
grief, the performance while still a tad hampered is acceptable. I
guess there's not much I can do about it except hope that things will
improve in the Mac FF3.
Thanks for the suggestions, that's very handy! =) While I think it has
helped some, it hasn't made an appreciable difference on the overall
performance.
I don't think it's the method of dissolve that's the problem. I tried
a scriptaculous fade and had the same issue. I think it's mostly the
fact
I'm trying to switch out an image by dynamically changing the source
value of an image. I tried using other methods of image replacement
but none of them work smoothly, there's major performance problems.
So anyway. Here's how I'm doing it right now.
j("#image img").fadeTo(500,0,function() {
#x27;)'
> }).insertBefore(img).append(img);
> img.css({opacity:0}).attr('src',newSrc);
> img.fadeTo(500,1,function(){ img.insertAfter(div);div.remove(); });
>
> JK
>
> -Original Message-
> From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
&g
f automated cycling. (I use it to crossfade through 2-4 images on a timer
> - the fade is perfect)
>
> I love the look of your gallery, BTW.
>
> j
>
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 8:23 PM, daveJay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I'm trying to switch o
I seem to be at a loss
I'm trying to run this code right here:
$("#image img").fadeTo(500,0,function() {
$("#image img").attr({src : imgSrcNext});
}).fadeTo(500, 1);
but in firefox 3, I see the fade away and the fade back, and THEN
firefox decides to switch the img source to the new ima
It must just be the Mac Version again.
On Jun 28, 5:44 am, "Alexandre Plennevaux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> works fine here (winXP SP3, FF3)
>
> Alexandre Plennevaux
>
> **
>
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 12:18 AM, daveJay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
&g
ac, it makes no sense at all.
On Jun 28, 8:34 am, daveJay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It must just be the Mac Version again.
>
> On Jun 28, 5:44 am, "Alexandre Plennevaux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > works fine here (winXP SP3, FF3)
>
> > Al
Thanks all for the comments =) I'm glad you like the pictures. AND,
I'm thrilled your commenting more on the pictures than you are the
design of the gallery, even though they have a symbiotic
relationship.
I'm glad that the problem is not affecting everyone, that's somewhat
of a relief, but I'm s
14 matches
Mail list logo
