On 6/27/07, Kia Niskavaara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, but what about other libraries?
var $j = jQuery.noConflict();
Maby this should be included in the greasemonkey script?
An excellent point, perhaps I'll stick the entire "[code]" region
inside of a closure so that one can still call jQu
Sean Catchpole wrote:
>
> On 6/25/07, Kia Niskavaara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Will this work if a site already is using jquery?
>
> Should do, jQuery has it's own "double loading" protection.
>
Yes, but what about other libraries?
http://docs.jquery.com/Using_jQuery_with_Other_Librarie
Hey Sean
At last you did dare to port 1.1.2 to GM! Gratz man.
Love to see this work done.
Cheers,
On 6/23/07, Sean Catchpole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey Michael,
If you code is inside of the usual $(function(){...}) then it will not
exectute.
I have not changed over v1.1.2 to Greasemonk
On 6/25/07, Kia Niskavaara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Will this work if a site already is using jquery?
Should do, jQuery has it's own "double loading" protection.
~Sean
Will this work if a site already is using jquery?
Sean Catchpole wrote:
>
> Ahoy,
>
> Seems like a had a little time, so here's the script:
> http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/10141
>
> Cheers
>
> ~Sean
>
Ahoy,
Seems like a had a little time, so here's the script:
http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/10141
Cheers
~Sean
Hey Michael,
If you code is inside of the usual $(function(){...}) then it will not exectute.
I have not changed over v1.1.2 to Greasemonkey, but if I get time
today I will do so.
~Sean
7 matches
Mail list logo
