On Sep 2, 2:21 pm, msoliver wrote:
> Fair point. What you suggest certainly would be better than no check.
> But, it's not a test that openerFunc is actually a function, just that
> it exists and has an call property.
That seems better to me than the crazy logic in 1.2's isFunction()!
Any time
On Sep 2, 1:16 pm, msoliver wrote:
> if ($.isFunction(openerFunc))
Why not just:
if (openerFunc && openerFunc.call)
?
Matt Kruse
Fair point. What you suggest certainly would be better than no check.
But, it's not a test that openerFunc is actually a function, just that
it exists and has an call property.
Thanks though,
- Mike
On Sep 2, 11:45 am, Matt Kruse wrote:
> On Sep 2, 1:16 pm, msoliver wrote:
>
> > if ($
3 matches
Mail list logo
