Thanks that is working.
You should be able to set up simple effects plugins like this:
jQuery.fn.extend({
widthShow: function(speed, easing, callback) {
return this.animate({width: 'show'}, speed, easing, callback);
},
widthHide: function(speed, easing, callback) {
return this.animate({width: 'hide'}, spee
One more thing on this--I was thinking about how to make this code
less "brittle" as far as the handling of the spacing. Since the s
in my list contain browser text, the height/spacing of the can
vary depending on a bunch of factors (ie. font size, line-height,
etc). Is there a way to have each
On 14 Feb, 15:04, spaceage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> andrea--thanks so much for this helpful tip.
you're welcome :)
> I would have expected some form of .each perhaps with an incrementing
> variable to use as the "multiplier" for determining the top value for
> each . If I read this correctl
andrea--thanks so much for this helpful tip. I get the positioning
and overflow stuff, but I'm unclear on the 'li:eq(' + n + ')' syntax--
I would have expected some form of .each perhaps with an incrementing
variable to use as the "multiplier" for determining the top value for
each . If I read t
On 13 Feb, 06:41, spaceage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is this a reasonable undertaking using jQuery, or is there another
> better way (or plug in) to do this?
jQuery is perfect for this kind of things :)
just give the div a overflow:hidden style, and the li's a
position:relative, and a very hig
Nice. Thanks for clarifying that John!
--
Brandon Aaron
On 5/14/07, John Resig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nope! jQuery uses only one timer for all animations now (even across
multiple elements). It helps drastically, with performance.
--John
On 5/13/07, Brandon Aaron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Resig
Sent: lundi 14 mai 2007 6:59
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: ..animation question..
Nope! jQuery uses only one timer for all animations now (even across
multiple elements). It helps drastically, with performance.
--John
On 5/13/07
Nope! jQuery uses only one timer for all animations now (even across
multiple elements). It helps drastically, with performance.
--John
On 5/13/07, Brandon Aaron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The latest SVN uses only one timer per an element but there currently
is not a way to animate several e
The latest SVN uses only one timer per an element but there currently
is not a way to animate several elements under one timer. I'm not sure
if Interface provides such a method either but perhaps that is where
such functionality should exist.
--
Brandon Aaron
On 5/13/07, spinnach <[EMAIL PROTE
10 matches
Mail list logo
