Sorry about that. Should be good now. ^Fingers Crossed^
On May 22, 7:53 am, "Jörn Zaefferer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Can't apply the patch, see comment on ticket.
>
> Jörn
>
> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 1:09 AM, Dane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Ticket #2908 created and patch attached. Let
Can't apply the patch, see comment on ticket.
Jörn
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 1:09 AM, Dane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ticket #2908 created and patch attached. Let me know if I should
> change anything.
>
> On May 19, 1:57 pm, "Jörn Zaefferer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> Just use "messages"
Ticket #2908 created and patch attached. Let me know if I should
change anything.
On May 19, 1:57 pm, "Jörn Zaefferer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Just use "messages" for embedding messages as metadata. The odds of
> adding a method "messages" are extremely low, and once its released,
> I'll upd
Just use "messages" for embedding messages as metadata. The odds of
adding a method "messages" are extremely low, and once its released,
I'll update the docs accordingly.
Jörn
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Dane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> -> "Avoiding the conflict between a method "message
-> "Avoiding the conflict between a method "messages" and those actual
messages should be easy enough. "
Should we plan on supporting a simulatanious "message" method and
custom messages in metadata?
As stated, I'm still climbing the learning curve :). Before I
implement this I just want to make
Ah, agreed. I'll make these changes and send in a ticket.
On May 15, 4:20 pm, "Jörn Zaefferer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> How about this?
>
> meta: default
> class="{required:true,minlength:2,messages:{required:'Enter
> this!',minlength:'Way to short'}}"
>
> meta: "validation"
> class="{validat
How about this?
meta: default
class="{required:true,minlength:2,messages:{required:'Enter
this!',minlength:'Way to short'}}"
meta: "validation"
class="{validation:{required:true,minlength:2,messages:{required:'Enter
this!',minlength:'Way to short'}}}"
No need to change the meta-option that way.
Ok I have a first cut done. elements can now have metadata like:
Quick question though. Which do you prefer?
1)$("#Form").validate({meta:"rules", metaMessages:"messages"});
2)$("#Form").validate({meta:{rules:"rules", messages:"messages"}});
I like 2, but it changes the existing API.
How do yo
Thanks for the help on getting started. I'd already started wading
through the source so you definitely saved me some time. I'm not
totally comfortable with Jquery yet but I'm getting there :). I'll
give this a go and see what happens. Should I just reply to this
thread to contribute/ask questions
It isn'T supported, yet. You could help getting it into the plugin by
trying to implement it yourself, and contributing it back.
To get started, take a look at the defaultMessage-method. Currently it
looks for custom messages specified via options, then for the title
attribute, then for default m
10 matches
Mail list logo
