> A lot of these are probably more for the benefit of the search
> engines and
> for SEO purposes. Tags like and gives
> search engines
> a little more information about what they're parsing (the same with
> the
> , and tags.)
It will be great for accessibility too, with vocal synthesis
That's not enough time for IE to catch up... ;-)
-Marshall
Glen Lipka wrote:
What browsers will support this? Will IE8? or FF3?
Seems like 5+ years before I can use any of it.
Glen
On 8/9/07, Benjamin
Sterling <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yeah,
I was going to post that this morning
On Thursday, August 09, 2007 2:01 PM Dan G. Switzer, II said:
> A lot of these are probably more for the benefit of the search
> engines and for SEO purposes. Tags like and
> gives search engines a little more information about what they're
> parsing (the same with the , and tags.)
>
> Obvio
Benjamin,
>Not exactly sure how I feel about it just yet. Some things like "header",
>"footer" and "nav" i get, but section and article I am not too sure of the
>usefulness of them. I kinda get time, meter and mark, but not sure how
>that translates into real world use. I see the examples, but
That's really cool Stephan, thanks for sharing. HTML needs a
refresher. Classitisis is everywhere and it would be nice to have a
few more useful tags to play with. Then again I use XML so I just make
tags up anyway =P.
~Sean
What browsers will support this? Will IE8? or FF3?
Seems like 5+ years before I can use any of it.
Glen
On 8/9/07, Benjamin Sterling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yeah, I was going to post that this morning to see what everyones take was
> going to be on that.
>
> Not exactly sure how I feel ab
Yeah, I was going to post that this morning to see what everyones take was
going to be on that.
Not exactly sure how I feel about it just yet. Some things like "header",
"footer" and "nav" i get, but section and article I am not too sure of the
usefulness of them. I kinda get time, meter and mar
7 matches
Mail list logo
