Hi Klaus! Thanks for the quick reply and excellent explanation. :)
That makes a lot of sense to me now. I will be sure to follow that
practice from now on.
Also, thank for the critique on my variable name(s)... I am going to
re-name a few for the sake of better clarity.
I owe you one! Thanks!
On 17 Dez., 08:31, Micky Hulse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> So, yes! The code works! Many thanks for the tips. :)
>
> In your last example, I am just wondering about the $ (dollar sign)
> before the "foo" variable. When should I use that on variables? I
> assume that I would do this
I am out of the office today, Monday 12/16/2007. I will be back in the
office Tuesday 12/17/2007.
If you need to reach me due to an emergency, please call my mobile at
770.367.8401.
Thanks,
Joe
Hi again,
So, yes! The code works! Many thanks for the tips. :)
In your last example, I am just wondering about the $ (dollar sign)
before the "foo" variable. When should I use that on variables? I
assume that I would do this if I am going to use that variable to
reference an element... For exam
A, many thanks Klaus, that does make a lot of sense...
I really appreciate the help from everyone. Many thanks all. :)
I am at work now, but will tweak my code later tonight with the newly
suggested changes.
Have a great day/night,
Cheers,
Micky
On Dec 13, 11:57 pm, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PRO
On 14 Dez., 08:55, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 14 Dez., 04:47, "Erik Beeson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Try:
>
> (function() {
> var $ele;
> $(document).ready(function() {
>$ele = $('#foo');
>$ele. // ... Do something with 'ele'...
> });
> $(window).load(f
On 14 Dez., 04:47, "Erik Beeson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Then ele will just be available for the scope of your closure. Also, if you
> really are doing something like your example, you might as well cache the
> jQuery object instead of the selector to save having to look it up twice. A
> good
Erik,
OMG, thanks!!! That is exactly what I was looking for... Also, thanks
for the extra tips, that makes perfect sense! Woot!
jQuery rocks!
Much appreciated.
Have a great day/night. ;)
Cheers,
Micky
On Dec 13, 7:47 pm, "Erik Beeson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you're just looking to keep
If you're just looking to keep from polluting the global namespace, you can
wrap all of your code in a closure. Lots of info here:
http://www.google.com/search?q=javascript+closures
For example (untested):
(function() {
var ele = '#foo';
$(document).ready(function() {
$(ele). // ... Do
Hmmm, would it be standard procedure to put $(window).load() within $
(document).ready()?
Also, anyone know of any basic class examples for jQuery?
Thanks! :)
Cheers,
Micky
On Dec 13, 12:14 am, Micky Hulse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just wondering what would be the best way to handle shared v
10 matches
Mail list logo
