Hi Dennis,
We had some issues with jqModal and unfortunately only the minified source
is available so we ended up using the jQuery UI dialog component with great
success.
(Note the filesize listed on the jQuery UI page is for the entire zip file,
the library itself is much smaller)
http://jqueryu
Yes, as I describe I use Joomla CMS where a lot of the functionality
is written in Mootools.
On 6 Okt., 15:35, Liam Potter wrote:
> is there a reason you need both libraries?
>
>
>
> Dennis Madsen wrote:
> > I'm developing a site in Joomla CMS which use both MooTools and
> > jQuery.
>
> > I've c
is there a reason you need both libraries?
Dennis Madsen wrote:
I'm developing a site in Joomla CMS which use both MooTools and
jQuery.
I've created a small, clean page where you can see the problem:
http://www.dennismadsen.com/uploads/mootools_jquery/
You can download the source-code from th
Working! thanks a ton!
Charlie escribió:
it's not the click function that's important in the FAQ, it's the
concept that events don't work on elements added to the DOM after page
load. That is due to browser functionality
Important to understand this part of link: *Why doesn't an event
wo
it's not the click function that's important in the FAQ, it's the
concept that events don't work on elements added to the DOM after page
load. That is due to browser functionality
Important to understand this part of link: Why doesn't an event
work on a new element I've created?
You can m
Charlie sorry, I don't get it .. am I supposed to use $('a').click(fn) ?
Did u read my code?
Thanks again !
Charlie escribió:
http://docs.jquery.com/Frequently_Asked_Questions#Why_doesn.27t_an_event_work_on_a_new_element_I.27ve_created.3F
Now that jQuery documentation comes in handy!
Arac
http://docs.jquery.com/Frequently_Asked_Questions#Why_doesn.27t_an_event_work_on_a_new_element_I.27ve_created.3F
Now that jQuery documentation comes in handy!
Araceli Domínguez wrote:
Charlie, thanks a ton for answering and thanks to all for reading.
I've changed the tooltip, you were right t
Charlie, thanks a ton for answering and thanks to all for reading.
I've changed the tooltip, you were right there's a bunch of very nice
tooltips made with jQuery.
I'm using jquery-tooltip and here's the result:
http://www.vivocomtech.net/vidzapper/jquery-tooltip/tipmix2.htm
As you'll see
If it was me I'd be saying "how can I change my Mootools code to
jQuery"? Why? You can't beat the documentation that surrounds jQuery!
When I originally probed around all the _javascript_ libraries
(YUI,Mootools,Prototype,Dojo) I realized pretty quickly that jQuery has
by far the best support
Thanks Ricardo. And sorry for not sticking, this is quite urgent and
didn't know who could help me.
I have to use Mootols tooltip .. so how can I convert my jQuery code
to mootools? haven't I done it yet?
The code is here:
http://www.vivocomtech.net/vidzapper/jQuery_andMoo_tooltip.rar
(2 kb
Stick to a single framework.. avoid confusion and save your users'
bandwidth. You should either convert your jQ code to mootools or use a
jQuery tooltip plugin.
And the whole thing you posted is unreadable, please use a sharing
site like jsbin.com or snipt.org :)
On Jul 6, 5:10 am, Lleoun wrote
Thanks very much for all your comments and links. I'm looking forward
to getting stuck into jQuery!
On Jan 12, 7:36 am, Rey Bango wrote:
> Hi Gbot,
>
> Welcome to the jQuery community. I don't think it's necessary to debate
> the merits of the two libs as both provide excellent capabilities.
>
>
Hi Gbot,
Welcome to the jQuery community. I don't think it's necessary to debate
the merits of the two libs as both provide excellent capabilities.
What is important, if you want to be successful, is that you clear your
mind of the "Mootools way" while you're trying to learn jQuery. To be
c
> From what I can see jQuery looks a little bit more straightforward to
> code, although it seems to me that Mootools does more "out of the box"
> - a lot of stuff I can write in Mootools in a few lines of code (using
> the core) seems to require additional classes or plug ins with jQuery
> - is t
That page has about three body and html tags so maybe you have to
correct it to work, usage example at the bottom:
http://jsbin.com/ibuje/edit
It could have been done with UI's widget factory as well:
http://docs.jquery.com/UI/Developer_Guide
but no dependency this way.
What compromises? :)
On
@MorningZ
I have just had the same problem and it was solved as u help!
Thanks in advance!
2008/10/3 MorningZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> You've got "$j" being used in the last block, but no where do you
> define what "$j" is
>
> so, right after your line
>
>
>
> tell the page what "$j" is supposed
You've got "$j" being used in the last block, but no where do you
define what "$j" is
so, right after your line
tell the page what "$j" is supposed to mean:
var $j = jQuery.noConflict();
All this is clearly laid out right on this Wiki page
http://docs.jquery.com/Using_jQuery_with_Other_Lib
can also try this.
(function($) {
$( document ).ready( function () {
$( '#call' ).scrollFollow( {
container: 'wrap'
} );
} );
})(jQuery);
jQuery.noConflict();
On Sep 12, 3:35 am, Mike Alsup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > $( document ).ready( function () {
> > $( '
can also try this.
$( document ).ready( function () {
$( '#call' ).scrollFollow( {
container: 'wrap'
} );
} );
})(jQuery);
jQuery.noConflict();
> $( document ).ready( function () {
> $( '#call' ).scrollFollow( {
> container: 'wrap'
> } );
> } );
change the scrollFollow call to:
jQuery('#call').scrollFollow(
I've never used Mootools, so I can only guess, but it looks like you
have an html structure like this:
some link
this will be toggled
some link
this will be toggled
If that's the case, this would probably work:
$(document).ready(function() {
$('.Boite')
Thanks for the respond Glen :) Unfortunately the page is not public so I
can't show much more - I know it's ridiculous to ask the question I've asked
when I can't give much more information :"(
I'll take your advise to go through the plugins and see if I get lucky :)
Many thanks
On Tue, Aug 19,
Thanks Adwin - your jquery.noConflict() suggestion is certainly a quick
solution for it, thanks :)
However, I have development team on my back and they've made a decision to
not to use any javascript frame work other then jQuery - so I cannot enter
their realms... :"(
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 4:3
btw, may i know why you need to convert from mootools to jquery ?
you can use jquery.noConflict() so it can work with mootools (beware,
some jquery plugins are not working with it)
On Aug 18, 6:24 pm, Hoi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm completely new to jquery (and not technical...) and I've
Is this page public? Seeing it would help.
There are often plugins that can do a bunch of stuff for you with little
code. (Im not that technical either, which is why I love plugins)
Glen
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 4:24 AM, Hoi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm completely new to jquery (and not
Just about everyone here likes jQuery. ;)
A quick googling shows a bunch of links to comparisons.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=jquery+vs+mootools&btnG=Google+Search
I would also suggest trying a couple of simple demos in each one.
I make alot of demos here: http://commadot.com/jquery
I a
As with most things, there are different ways to achieve what you
want. This is just one of them...
Assumption: you have some styles defined along the lines of:
#demo-wrapper {height:250px; overflow:hidden;}
.scrolling-content {height:250px;}
(actual values are not relevant, and overflow could
jQuery.LocalScroll:
http://flesler.blogspot.com/2007/10/jquerylocalscroll-10.html
--
Ariel Flesler
http://flesler.blogspot.com
On 20 mayo, 08:27, Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a coda slider working using mootools, but want to use JQuery as
> my main library.
>
> I have t
I am sorry to repost again about this conflict, but I am still having
the conflict beetween this two frameworks. I would like to say that I
LARGELY prefer jQuery, which makes me able (just a graphic with NO
coding skills...) to add utilities and effects to my site in a breeze
(thanks, really)! But
Thanks for your reply.
I realized that the component might be using 1.1.4 version.
I have requested them to upgrade it.
Meanwhile, how can I upgrade the jQuery by myself ?
Here is the file -
http://gigahertz.byethost18.com/components/com_fireboard/template/default/js/jquery-latest.pack.js
This was fixed in jQuery version 1.2 (and newer). Using that version
of the library shouldn't cause you any problems.
--John
On 9/28/07, Ayan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dear sir,
>
> I am facing this problem... yes, its because mootool+jQuery.
> My Joomla site's Template system runs on mooto
Dear sir,
I am facing this problem... yes, its because mootool+jQuery.
My Joomla site's Template system runs on mootool, but my one of the
component runs on jQuery.
So, I need to do this Hack.
My question is -
If I convert '$event' to '$event2', will it effect on the workings of
the template s
Here there is more one Brazilian in this mail-list.
jQuery na veia.
On 2 set, 10:03, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Olmo,
>
> > I'll add a signature from now on it seems.
>
> Thanks. That helps out quite a bit. Kind of like I did when I posted in
> the MooTools forum. Its always good t
Hi Olmo,
I'll add a signature from now on it seems.
Thanks. That helps out quite a bit. Kind of like I did when I posted in
the MooTools forum. Its always good to let people know where you're
coming from.
I don't need to waste my time in trying to lecture you. Should have
known better.
I'll add a signature from now on it seems.
I don't need to waste my time in trying to lecture you. Should have
known better.
-Olmo M.
http://mootools.net/developers
On Sep 1, 8:35 am, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, in the interest of full disclosure, for those that don't know,
> O
Well, in the interest of full disclosure, for those that don't know,
Olmo is part of the MooTools development team.
Now, back to the topic. If there's nothing to glean and there's no
benefit in sending list members to what ended up as a very unproductive
discussion, why would it be the right
There's nothing to glean. It's the right thing to do.
-Olmo M.
On Aug 31, 9:23 pm, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, I didn't. I left it out intentionally as there was nothing to
> be gleaned from the thread.
>
> Rey...
>
> Olmo wrote:
> > You forgot to post the url to theMooToolsf
Actually, I didn't. I left it out intentionally as there was nothing to
be gleaned from the thread.
Rey...
Olmo wrote:
You forgot to post the url to the MooTools forum:
http://forum.mootools.net/viewtopic.php?id=5190#post-26592
-Olmo M.
You forgot to post the url to the MooTools forum:
http://forum.mootools.net/viewtopic.php?id=5190#post-26592
-Olmo M.
On Aug 30, 4:05 pm, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There was a recent flurry of emails on the list discussing a conflict
> with the use ofMooToolsin conjunction with jQue
thanks ray for the oportunity and I would like to say that the jQuery
in Brazil is well represented.
Im glad to help the jQuery team with this issue and I hope help even
more.
Congratulations for you and all jQuery team.
On 30 ago, 18:05, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There was a recen
n
> >
> > Behalf Of Burobjorn
> > Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 6:39 AM
> > To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
> > Subject: [jQuery] Re: Mootools
> >
> > Just a quick observation:
> > Check your cpu usage during this slideshow. In my case on a Core2 Duo
&
playing.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>
> Behalf Of Burobjorn
> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 6:39 AM
> To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [jQuery] Re: Mootools
>
> Just a quick observation:
>
bject: [jQuery] Re: Mootools
Just a quick observation:
Check your cpu usage during this slideshow. In my case on a Core2 Duo
macbook it puts both cores to around 40%. Kinda high if you ask me for a
slideshow especially if you would use this in a site with more js events
going on. It could easily
Just a quick observation:
Check your cpu usage during this slideshow. In my case on a Core2 Duo
macbook it puts both cores to around 40%. Kinda high if you ask me for a
slideshow especially if you would use this in a site with more js events
going on. It could easily make your computer less re
briefly? "not as good."
o
On Jul 28, 7:13 pm, "Mitchell Waite" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can anyone tell me how this compares to jQuery, briefly?
>
> Mitch
Reason I asked about Mootools is I love there slideshow. It allows doing
the Ken Burns effects that was mentioned Nicolas last week. Check out
this wicked class demo:
http://www.electricprism.com/aeron/slideshow/
Wow -- that's a helluva plugin, and a *really* great demo.
~ ~ Dave
t;
>
>
> *From:* jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On
> Behalf Of *Benjamin Sterling
> *Sent:* Saturday, July 28, 2007 7:20 PM
> *To:* jquery-en@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* [jQuery] Re: Mootools
>
>
>
> There were a few length discussion that may help you:
>
>
>
ies you will see
> it fades in a small part of an image, then zooms out and pans at the same
> time.
>
>
>
> H I wonder if that could be done using some of the Interface Elements
> effects?
>
>
>
> Mitch
>
>
>
> *From:* jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mai
wonder if that could be done using some of the Interface Elements
effects?
Mitch
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Benjamin Sterling
Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2007 7:20 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Mootools
There were a few
Searching previous posts works really well on google groups. There have
been quite a few discussions about this topic.
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/5d52f35ac4f2cb1c/419f7bbc13d8a385?lnk=gst&q=mootools&rnum=5#419f7bbc13d8a385
-Marshall
Mitchell Waite wrote:
There were a few length discussion that may help you:
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/search?group=jquery-en&q=Mootools&qt_g=Search+this+group
This one I believe was the one that was pretty good.
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/5d52f35ac4f2cb1c/c36f9836b6d1e
On 7/5/07, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Are you using jQuery, MooTools or both?
>
> Rey
only jquery... I have solved it!
changed the line
$("dd:not(:first)").hide();
to
$("dd:first").hide();
This is the right way?
luciano
> Luciano A. Ferrer wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I need to use m
Are you using jQuery, MooTools or both?
Rey
Luciano A. Ferrer wrote:
Hi!
I need to use mootools accordion, but just with 1 item...
so, it would be nice to have it closed when pages loads...
Do you have any idea about how to achieve this?
(I am stupid using javascript... :( )
TIA, and sorr
Then, there's that nasty two bugs: [...] and quirky animation in FF.
From what I have seen, the animation issue should be resolved with
1.1.3. Give one of the recent nightly builds a spin to make sure your
issue is fixed though.
Ian
On 5/9/07, Dragan Krstic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But,
But, all the demos are outside of jquery site, which doesn't have good
effect. Then, there's that nasty two bugs: event overloading (especially
during hovering) and quirky animation in FF.
--
Dragan Krstić krdr
http://krdr.ebloggy.com/
I agree completely.
Currently, we have a pretty weak selection of demos:
http://docs.jquery.com/Demos
Sean and Andy - wanna login and flush out the list with what you think
would make for good demos? (You don't actually have to build the
demos, unless you want to - it'll just help us to get a b
Ralf, I know that jQuery can do everything that mootools can, and
often better. But just because I know doesn't mean other people do.
MooTools looks sexy, and jQuery, for the moment being, lacks that.
Jeffrey, that's exactly my point. We should have more examples of
jQuery's abilities.
As I sai
Query (English)
Subject: [jQuery] Re: MooTools 1.1
Jquery could do all this stuff, but I think it's just that moo.tools
have a very neatly presented site
ry-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im
> Auftrag von Andy Matthews
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. Mai 2007 19:53
> An: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
> Betreff: [jQuery] Re: MooTools 1.1
>
> Holy crap. Those demos are freaking awesome!
>
> _
>
> From: jquery-en@goo
effects on top !
Greets
Ralf
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im
Auftrag von Andy Matthews
Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. Mai 2007 19:53
An: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Betreff: [jQuery] Re: MooTools 1.1
Holy crap. Those demos are freaking awesome!
_
Fr
On 5/8/07, John Resig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I agree - they did a very nice job with the demos site. I'm sure we
could arrange for something similar on the main site.
We should really push an effort to create as many "cut&paste" example
as possible. People see, they grab, they edit. That's
Holy crap. Those demos are freaking awesome!
_
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Glen Lipka
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 11:48 AM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] MooTools 1.1
Moo Tools 1.1 is out. Check out these demos.
http://demos.
I agree - they did a very nice job with the demos site. I'm sure we
could arrange for something similar on the main site.
--John
On 5/8/07, Glen Lipka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Moo Tools 1.1 is out. Check out these demos.
http://demos.mootools.net
It's a great demo set. Clean and understanda
63 matches
Mail list logo
