is html. not javascript!
Does IE do this any differently than firefox?
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd";>
http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en">
nbsp;
$(function(){
var x = " "
alert(x.le
Michael! So great to see you on the list again! You have a brilliant
mind, and I always learn something new whenever you post.
I was beginning to wonder where you've been. Glad to have you back. :-)
--Karl
_
Karl Swedberg
www.englishrules.com
www.learningjquery.com
On Apr 2
On 4/28/07, Michael Geary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Indeed there is, return false. See my #1 example which is similar to
yours...
I should have used my eyes before I started typing. My question's
code is almost exactly what you wrote, just cosmetic differences. I
missed the assignment + ret
> From: Ian Struble
> Just out of curiosity is there a way to break out while
> iterating with .each()? Again building on the previous
> example (Mike's #2 this time):
>
> $(function() {
>$('tr').each( function() {
>var allEmpty = true;
>$('td', this).each(funcion() {
>
[...] isn't there a big performance impact using this piece of code?
That's why I said play around a bit ;^) I threw that idea out there
mostly because it is sort of inside-out from style that I would
probably have tried first and it was just building off the previous
example. That sort of t
Hey Mike, thanks for you answers... your code is being executed much
faster, thanks! I just changed this:
var $td = $('td',this);
to
var $td = $('td:gt(1)',this);
Because I want to exclude the first TD from the checking. Right now
it's conflicting with another line of code that "stripes" (zeb
> From: Feed
>
> Thanks Ian, it seem to be working perfectly. I just have one more
> question: isn't there a big performance impact using this
> piece of code? It looks like the page it taking a while do
> load, but I guess you have to choose between the time the
> page takes to load and the t
That's very clever, Ian, I like that!
Here's another approach that uses a variable instead of the temporary class:
$(function() {
$('tr').each( function() {
var empty = true;
$('td',this).each(function() {
if( $(this).html() !== ' ' )
return empty
Thanks Ian, it seem to be working perfectly. I just have one more
question: isn't there a big performance impact using this piece of
code? It looks like the page it taking a while do load, but I guess
you have to choose between the time the page takes to load and the
time you take to do everything
Thanks Ian, I'll play around with this piece of code! jQuery is really
helping me in my project, it's awesome.
On Apr 28, 1:20 am, "Ian Struble" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Building on Karl's example and your new all-td's-must-be-empty
> requirement; mark all the TR's with a target class then sw
Building on Karl's example and your new all-td's-must-be-empty
requirement; mark all the TR's with a target class then sweep through
the TD's and get rid of the target class if you find a td that is not
empty. Play around a bit and see what else you can come up with.
Ian
$(document).read
Feed wrote:
> Hello all, I'm getting used to the excellent jQuery library and I need
> some help of more experienced programmers. I have this simple table:
>
>
>
> content
> content
> content
>
>
>
>
>
This should do the trick, although there's probably a way to do it
without the .each(), too.
$(document).ready(function() {
$('td').each(function() {
var $this = $(this);
if ($this.html() == ' ') {
$this.parent().addClass('some-class');
}
});
});
--Karl
_
You could create a new pseudo-selector like this:
jQuery.extend(jQuery.expr[':'], {
blank: "jQuery.fn.text.apply([a])=='\u00a0'"
});
And then use it to find the desired rows like this:
var rows = $('td:blank').parent();
Mike
What I need is to add a class to the TRs that have children TD
is html-speak.
"'\u00a0" is JavaScript-speak.
On 4/27/07, Feed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello all, I'm getting used to the excellent jQuery library and I need
some help of more experienced programmers. I have this simple table:
content
content
15 matches
Mail list logo
