Charlie Griefer wrote:
There's no functional difference between using an external .js file or
putting your JS in the page itself. Arguably, it's easier to maintain if
it's well-organized in included files... but functionally no different.
Well, there's the advantage of the .js file being cache
No worries. Send me a NJ pizza. I haven't had good pizza since I left NJ
:)
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Glen_H wrote:
>
> Thanks again!
>
> Thanks from Central jersey too! I saw on your site your home grown
> Jersey, Good stuff.
>
>
> Take it easy man.
>
> Glen
>
> On Sep 30, 11:05 pm, Ch
Thanks again!
Thanks from Central jersey too! I saw on your site your home grown
Jersey, Good stuff.
Take it easy man.
Glen
On Sep 30, 11:05 pm, Charlie Griefer
wrote:
> As with including an external .js file, including an external .css file is
> not functionally different than including it
As with including an external .js file, including an external .css file is
not functionally different than including it on the page. The included css
will affect any applicable element(s) on the page.
When you manipulate an element's CSS with jQuery, you're just manipulating
the CSS of that speci
Charlie, thanks for the feedback. A million times thank you! that is
exactly what I was looking for.
One other question I have is altering CSS using .css in Jquery, will
that auto select any linked css files or will I have to further
develop the jquery code to further direct it? I ask becuse well
in your main page...
you link to jquery.js:
Then you can either write inline javascript under that...
$(document).ready(function() {
alert("I am ready");
});
... or you simply link to other external scripts:
...as many times as you need to.
There's no functional di
6 matches
Mail list logo
