[jQuery] Re: Help Test jQuery 1.1.3

2007-06-11 Thread Tane Piper
Works very nicely! I've had some small issues with getting the HTML Tidy plugin to work, but I think thats a local paths issue rather than a bug in your code, but I'll let you know more - i'm looking into it today. On 6/8/07, Jean-Francois Hovinne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This one could d

[jQuery] Re: Help Test jQuery 1.1.3

2007-06-07 Thread Jean-Francois Hovinne
This one could definitely solve the problem, if it complies to jQuery's requirements. FYI, WYMeditor 0.3 has been released, as a jQuery plugin. Any feedback is welcome. On 7 juin, 14:17, Volker Mische <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've written a new patch, please take a look > athttp://dev.jque

[jQuery] Re: Help Test jQuery 1.1.3

2007-06-07 Thread Volker Mische
Hi, > I've added a new patch to the ticket based on Volker's patch. Can you please > confirm that it does indeed fix the problem?http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/1143 No it doesn't work as it doesn't travers all node recursively. I've written a new patch, please take a look at http://dev.jquery.com/

[jQuery] Re: Help Test jQuery 1.1.3

2007-05-30 Thread Brandon Aaron
I've added a new patch to the ticket based on Volker's patch. Can you please confirm that it does indeed fix the problem? http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/1143 -- Brandon Aaron On 5/24/07, Jean-Francois Hovinne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks for your quick reply, John, and sorry for annoying y

[jQuery] Re: Help Test jQuery 1.1.3

2007-05-29 Thread Brian Cherne
Hi John, I quickly tested jQuery 1.1.3a with my jVariations plug-in and it crashed Safari (immediately). I'm going to take a look into it this week and will hopefully be able to provide more information. The page I was testing it on was quite complex and Safari was already struggling (taking a few

[jQuery] Re: Help Test jQuery 1.1.3

2007-05-25 Thread Volker Mische
Hi, > > I have to admit that I haven't found a faster solution. > > removeAttribute() just takes to much time. So perhaps the serializer > > should be "fixed". This would mean a slow down for Internet Explorer > > on html(), but this seems ok for me, as this is a Internet Explorer > > bug. > > Th

[jQuery] Re: Help Test jQuery 1.1.3

2007-05-24 Thread John Resig
I have to admit that I haven't found a faster solution. removeAttribute() just takes to much time. So perhaps the serializer should be "fixed". This would mean a slow down for Internet Explorer on html(), but this seems ok for me, as this is a Internet Explorer bug. That's absolutely a possibi

[jQuery] Re: Help Test jQuery 1.1.3

2007-05-24 Thread Volker Mische
Hi, I have to admit that I haven't found a faster solution. removeAttribute() just takes to much time. So perhaps the serializer should be "fixed". This would mean a slow down for Internet Explorer on html(), but this seems ok for me, as this is a Internet Explorer bug. Something different: merg

[jQuery] Re: Help Test jQuery 1.1.3

2007-05-24 Thread Volker Mische
I think mergeNum won't be added everytime, it gets only added if you need to run an uniqueness test (when find() was called). I even think unique() can be removed when merge gets changed a bit. I've some ideas, at the end it should be faster and have a smaller file size. Cu, Volker. On 24 Mai,

[jQuery] Re: Help Test jQuery 1.1.3

2007-05-24 Thread Volker Mische
Hi, On 24 Mai, 22:39, "John Resig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > $(...).find("*").each(function(){ delete this.mergeNum; }); This won't work in Internet Explorer. > Having the value come up as mergeNum="null" tells me that there's > something very wrong at play here. What exactly are you using

[jQuery] Re: Help Test jQuery 1.1.3

2007-05-24 Thread Brandon Aaron
Just a side note, that will probably crash IE. IE doesn't like to delete things from elements. -- Brandon Aaron On 5/24/07, John Resig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What if you straight-out delete the property? $(...).find("*").each(function(){ delete this.mergeNum; }); Having the value come up

[jQuery] Re: Help Test jQuery 1.1.3

2007-05-24 Thread John Resig
What if you straight-out delete the property? $(...).find("*").each(function(){ delete this.mergeNum; }); Having the value come up as mergeNum="null" tells me that there's something very wrong at play here. What exactly are you using to serialize the contents of the designMode area? --John On

[jQuery] Re: Help Test jQuery 1.1.3

2007-05-24 Thread John Resig
Not sure. There's still a lot of tricky bugs that have popped up, that we still need to find the root cause of (then patch, fix, and re-test). Not to mention backporting the documentation from the wiki into the codebase again. I'm leaning more towards mid-next week. --John On 5/24/07, Shelane E

[jQuery] Re: Help Test jQuery 1.1.3

2007-05-24 Thread Jean-Francois Hovinne
Thanks for your quick reply, John, and sorry for annoying you with that issue, but it seems to be a major blocker for WYMeditor to work correctly with jQuery in MSIE. I did test the fix you propose (this.mergeNum = null). The attribute is still there, i.e. mergeNum="null" for each element. This

[jQuery] Re: Help Test jQuery 1.1.3

2007-05-24 Thread Shelane Enos
Is there still the possibility of a final release this week? I've tested against the basics and some of my more complicated internal apps and all is working well. On 5/24/07 1:10 PM, "John Resig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Did you test it against the test suite? And did you test it for sp

[jQuery] Re: Help Test jQuery 1.1.3

2007-05-24 Thread John Resig
Did you test it against the test suite? And did you test it for speed changes? The reason why this is being done, in the first place, is purely for speed reasons. Added extra checks or loops significantly slows down the speed of jQuery selectors. The mergeNum technique is the fastest means of che

[jQuery] Re: Help Test jQuery 1.1.3

2007-05-24 Thread Jean-Francois Hovinne
I've applied and tested the patch with MSIE, FF (Win + Linux) and Opera. Works fine for me! Thanks Volker :) I've committed the patched jQuery to WYMeditor SVN [1]. A test page is available at [2]. [1]: svn://svn.wymeditor.org/wymeditor [2]: http://dev.wymeditor.org/wymeditor/trunk/src/test/adva

[jQuery] Re: Help Test jQuery 1.1.3

2007-05-24 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, please take a look at my patch for ticket http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/1143 I'm not sure why mergeNum was actually used, I think a simple boolean should be enough. Cu, Volker. On 21 Mai, 14:39, Jean-Francois Hovinne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for your help. > > Actually, I can re

[jQuery] Re: Help Test jQuery 1.1.3

2007-05-23 Thread Brandon Aaron
On 5/21/07, Daemach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The tabs plugin uses the fadein/out effects - I'll bet it has something to do with a bug I just found. It's hard to describe - I'm just glad I could replicate it. Test case below. http://ideamill.synaptrixgroup.com/jquery/test/113fxbug.htm Go

[jQuery] Re: Help Test jQuery 1.1.3

2007-05-21 Thread Daemach
The tabs plugin uses the fadein/out effects - I'll bet it has something to do with a bug I just found. It's hard to describe - I'm just glad I could replicate it. Test case below. http://ideamill.synaptrixgroup.com/jquery/test/113fxbug.htm On May 21, 4:38 pm, "Aaron Heimlich" <[EMAIL PROTECTE

[jQuery] Re: Help Test jQuery 1.1.3

2007-05-21 Thread Daemach
You're right. When I was testing that it turns out that I wasn't passing any arguments to my function, and it would have behaved the same way in 1.1.2. However, my example is a good one - in this case, I still want the last object's properties applied. Does it make sense to modify the extend fu

[jQuery] Re: Help Test jQuery 1.1.3

2007-05-21 Thread Aaron Heimlich
I can confirm the same issue on Firefox 2.0.0.3, Safari 2.0.4 (build 419.3), and Opera 9.20 (build 3669) (all on Mac OS 10.4.9) On 5/21/07, Glen Lipka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Working tabs plugin with 1.1.2 http://www.marketo.com/about/contact.php Broken with 1.1.3 http://www.marketo.com/tem

[jQuery] Re: Help Test jQuery 1.1.3

2007-05-21 Thread Glen Lipka
On 5/21/07, Jörn Zaefferer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Daemach wrote: > It appears that extend no longer extends objects with more than one > object. In 1.1.2 I could do: > > this.settings = jQuery.extend({}, this.defaults, > arguments.options, this.userOptionsFromCookie); // named to > il

[jQuery] Re: Help Test jQuery 1.1.3

2007-05-21 Thread Jörn Zaefferer
Daemach wrote: It appears that extend no longer extends objects with more than one object. In 1.1.2 I could do: this.settings = jQuery.extend({}, this.defaults, arguments.options, this.userOptionsFromCookie); // named to illustrate purpose Now, only the arguments.options values extend th

[jQuery] Re: Help Test jQuery 1.1.3

2007-05-21 Thread Brandon Aaron
It appears that the helper method "left" has been removed from the API. Try replacing left with $().css('left', 260); -- Brandon Aaron On 5/21/07, Dragan Krstic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 2007/5/21, Brandon Aaron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Do you know what version/rev of the dimensions plugin y

[jQuery] Re: Help Test jQuery 1.1.3

2007-05-21 Thread Daemach
It appears that extend no longer extends objects with more than one object. In 1.1.2 I could do: this.settings = jQuery.extend({}, this.defaults, arguments.options, this.userOptionsFromCookie); // named to illustrate purpose Now, only the arguments.options values extend the defaults. Is t

[jQuery] Re: Help Test jQuery 1.1.3

2007-05-21 Thread Dragan Krstic
2007/5/21, Brandon Aaron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Do you know what version/rev of the dimensions plugin you are using? What browser(s) are you having problems with? I'm not quite sure. I'm using striped off version. File is created on January,18th. In firebug I'm getting the following: headlines

[jQuery] Re: Help Test jQuery 1.1.3

2007-05-21 Thread Brandon Aaron
Do you know what version/rev of the dimensions plugin you are using? What browser(s) are you having problems with? Here is the latest version's test suite running on 1.1.3: http://brandonaaron.net/jquery/plugins/dimensions/test/unit.html -- Brandon Aaron On 5/21/07, Dragan Krstic <[EMAIL PROT

[jQuery] Re: Help Test jQuery 1.1.3

2007-05-21 Thread Dragan Krstic
I have a problems with dimensions plugin. width and height couldn't be read

[jQuery] Re: Help Test jQuery 1.1.3

2007-05-21 Thread Jörn Zaefferer
John Resig wrote: Hi Everyone - A test build of the upcoming 1.1.3 release is ready for everyone to try. We need to be super-sure that there haven't been any regressions in this release, and in order to do that we'd like you to download this alpha release and try it in place of jQuery 1.1.2 (w

[jQuery] Re: Help Test jQuery 1.1.3

2007-05-21 Thread Andrea Ercolino
I've just tested it with Chili 1.8 and all is ok. Just a little thing: the show() / hide() functions work much slower than before and they have a 'nice' (quoted because not needed nor requested) transition effect, which is maybe responsible for the slow-down factor. hide() is a bit faster than s

[jQuery] Re: Help Test jQuery 1.1.3

2007-05-21 Thread Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ
I think we are supposed to ignore $attrs in IE. I was amazed to see mergenum sneak through! $mergenum should work as well, but should be ignored. in http://jqueryjs.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/plugins/debug/ I happily ignore attributes that start with $ On 5/21/07, Jean-Francois Hovinne <[EMAIL PR

[jQuery] Re: Help Test jQuery 1.1.3

2007-05-21 Thread Jean-Francois Hovinne
Thanks for your help. Actually, I can remove the attribute using removeAttr, but the extra DIVs remain (for example if you create inline elements in lists). IMHO, as the problem only occurs in MSIE - no mergeNum issue in Gecko nor in Opera - I'm rather thinking about a browser specific issue. T

[jQuery] Re: Help Test jQuery 1.1.3

2007-05-21 Thread Renato Formato
Jean-Francois Hovinne ha scritto: Well, I've replied to Brandon (by email) that his fix didn't work: the mergenum attr simply becomes $mergenum in the resultant HTML code. Using other variable names (such as 'mytest') doesn't fix the problem. Using the code you propose (this.mergeNum = null;)

[jQuery] Re: Help Test jQuery 1.1.3

2007-05-21 Thread Jean-Francois Hovinne
Well, I've replied to Brandon (by email) that his fix didn't work: the mergenum attr simply becomes $mergenum in the resultant HTML code. Using other variable names (such as 'mytest') doesn't fix the problem. Using the code you propose (this.mergeNum = null;) generates mergenum="null" attributes

[jQuery] Re: Help Test jQuery 1.1.3

2007-05-21 Thread John Resig
Max - Your bug came up here: http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/1217 It was just being really slow. Thanks for the catch. --John On 5/21/07, mpenet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Keyboard event handling seems broken. event.which seems to be read- only. I tried to create a ticket about it but trac do

[jQuery] Re: Help Test jQuery 1.1.3

2007-05-21 Thread mpenet
Keyboard event handling seems broken. event.which seems to be read- only. I tried to create a ticket about it but trac doesn't want me too . You can test it with : $(document).keypress( function() { alert("Hello"); } ); - then press any key: "event.which = event.keyCode;" setting a property th

[jQuery] Re: Help Test jQuery 1.1.3

2007-05-21 Thread John Resig
The proposed fix is not valid, however - due to the fact that it breaks how the unique() function works (removing duplicate items). Additionally, the only 'fix' is to traverse through every element and remove all the mergenum properties - which is a major slowdown for all selectors. In what cas

[jQuery] Re: Help Test jQuery 1.1.3

2007-05-21 Thread jf . hovinne
Hi, It would be very nice if bug #1143 could be fixed because it is a major blocker for WYMeditor (MSIE version) to generate correct XHTML. A fix is proposed (commenting out one line), and seems to work fine (also tested with 1.1.3a). http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/1143 Thank you, Jean-François h

[jQuery] Re: Help Test jQuery 1.1.3

2007-05-20 Thread John Resig
I've posted my thoughts here: http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/1212 "This is because both of the plugins overwrite the easing object instead of extending it :-( The default easing in jQuery is called 'swing' - which isn't available in either plugin (thus causing the errors). I assume that if the eas

[jQuery] Re: Help Test jQuery 1.1.3

2007-05-20 Thread Karl Swedberg
Hey John, tested tons of selectors and all appear to be working as expected. also, .fadeIn() after .hide() is working again, as is .fadeIn () / .fadeOut() with table rows. Hooray!! looks like there is a bug with animations whenever an easing plugin is included in the file. Created ticket :

[jQuery] Re: Help Test jQuery 1.1.3

2007-05-20 Thread John Resig
Glen - A more-specific example would be great (using a copy of 1.1.3a). Feel free to post the URL once you have it up. --John On 5/20/07, Glen Lipka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Just to see, I swapped our 1.1.2 and put in the link you had above. It broke the Tabs plugin. http://www.marketo.com/

[jQuery] Re: Help Test jQuery 1.1.3

2007-05-20 Thread pd
I've tested it and zebra striping is fine, mouseover/out highlighting is fine, getJSON is still fine as well. Tested with Fx 2.0.0.3, IE7 and IE6 (SP2) on Windows XP. On May 21, 11:29 am, "John Resig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Everyone - > > A test build of the upcoming 1.1.3 release is re

[jQuery] Re: Help Test jQuery 1.1.3

2007-05-20 Thread Glen Lipka
Just to see, I swapped our 1.1.2 and put in the link you had above. It broke the Tabs plugin. http://www.marketo.com/about/contact.php Also, my RSS problem previously posted. Firefox still worked both, but now IE couldn't load either one. http://www.marketo.com/rsstest.htm I can put up sample pa

[jQuery] Re: Help Test jQuery 1.1.3

2007-05-20 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ohh me goodies, will try. thanks for the heads up cheers -Nilesh On May 20, 9:29 pm, "John Resig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Everyone - > > A test build of the upcoming 1.1.3 release is ready for everyone to > try. We need to be super-sure that there haven't been any regressions > in this r