>This works on your demo page. (Using FF and Firebug command line of
>course.)
>
>jQuery('[EMAIL PROTECTED]"text"]').setValue('1234')
>
>but this doesn't work.
>
>jQuery('[EMAIL PROTECTED]"text"]').setValue(1234)
>
>The solution is to make sure the type is string before doing a split.
>(Of course
Dan,
Will that be added to the core build you have... or should I create
another version local to prevent upgrades from creating bugs?
John
Dan G. Switzer, II wrote:
> John,
>
>
>> Found a possible bug.
>>
>> This works on your demo page. (Using FF and Firebug command line of
>> course.)
>>
John,
>Would it be a good idea to have the setter/getter look at the field type
>and if it were an array based field to call the "fieldArray" function
>directly? That way everything could run off a common single function.
I had a public discussion about this on the list a while back. My original
John,
>Found a possible bug.
>
>This works on your demo page. (Using FF and Firebug command line of
>course.)
>
>jQuery('[EMAIL PROTECTED]"text"]').setValue('1234')
>
>but this doesn't work.
>
>jQuery('[EMAIL PROTECTED]"text"]').setValue(1234)
Yeah, it currently needs a string. You could probabl
Dan,
Would it be a good idea to have the setter/getter look at the field type
and if it were an array based field to call the "fieldArray" function
directly? That way everything could run off a common single function.
John Farrar
Found a possible bug.
This works on your demo page. (Using FF and Firebug command line of course.)
jQuery('[EMAIL PROTECTED]"text"]').setValue('1234')
but this doesn't work.
jQuery('[EMAIL PROTECTED]"text"]').setValue(1234)
The solution is to make sure the type is string before doing a split.
Hmmm... I just ran the test in my install of IE7 and didn't get any kind of
alerts.
-Dan
_
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Farrar
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 9:49 AM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Form El
Looks interesting Dan.
Note: IE7 is complaining about scripted windows on your set functions. I
let it run the script by you might want to know that as far as how you
or others implement this technology. It doesn't appear to be an issue
with your plug-in but rather the implementation.
John Far
John,
>Does anyone have a way to pull individual form elements via a common
>request simular to how they use $F() in prototypt? I would like to be
>able to set/get any form element value via this scope using the
>element ID. (Currently select boxes don't work the same as an input
>element to my p
>The form plugin has a method called fieldValue which is a getter and
>is comparable to $F. Currently the plugin has no complementary setter
>method.
There's always my getter/setter functions:
http://www.pengoworks.com/workshop/jquery/field.plugin.htm
-Dan
I haven't a clue what $F does, but unserialize is the opposite of serialize
jQuery.fn.unserialize = function(search){
var items = search.split('&');
for (var i = 0; i < items.length; i++) {
var parts = items[i].split(/=/);
this.filter('[EMAIL PROTECTED]'+ parts
John,
The form plugin has a method called fieldValue which is a getter and
is comparable to $F. Currently the plugin has no complementary setter
method.
Mike
On 6/16/07, John Farrar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does anyone have a way to pull individual form elements via a common
request simu
12 matches
Mail list logo
