timothytoe wrote:
: This next one is obviously a work of JavaScript art (as opposed to the
: former, which is a more jQuery solution).
Actually, it's very jQuery-ish. We can use a similar form to add
custom methods to the jQuery object.
: Does anyone want to explain it?
:
: for ( i=0;i<
Ah, that makes sense. Thanks.
On Jan 31, 4:04 pm, Danny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Depends on what you're trying to do. In your case, the index and the
> value are identical, but next time they may not be:
> $.each( ['a','b','c'], function (index, val){
> // index is 0...1...2, val is 'a'...'
Depends on what you're trying to do. In your case, the index and the
value are identical, but next time they may not be:
$.each( ['a','b','c'], function (index, val){
// index is 0...1...2, val is 'a'...'b'...'c'
});
On Jan 31, 3:40 pm, timothytoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> $.each( [0,1,2,3,4
$.each( [0,1,2,3,4], function(index, num) {
$("#port"+num).click(function() { bigchart(num); });
});
Wait. What's the "index" in there for. I don't need that, do I? Seems
to work fine without it. I'll assume that was a leftover from a
previous idea.
I ended up using this. I liked it much better than my previous
solution (passing in "this" and then stripping the digit out in the
handler).
$.each( [0,1,2,3,4], function(index, num) {
$("#port"+num).click(function() { bigchart(num); });
});
This one is easy for me to read, comprehend, and m
for ( i=0;i<5;i++ ) {
(function(num) {
$("#port"+num).click(function() { bigchart(num) });
})(i);
}
That's the one I was trying to figure out. Nicely done.
-- Josh
Thanks for all the examples. I was able to find a couple ways on my
own, but I love to see how other people solve these problems so I can
learn new techniques.
Hardest thing for me when in JavaScript is taking my mind out of C and
PHP. Shared syntax is a blessing and a curse.
One more reply for good measure ...
Using jQuery.each will provide you the isolation you need to make your
original code work.
jQurey.each( [0,1,2,3,4], function(index, num) {
$("#port"+num).click(function() { bigchart(num); });
});
You should also be able to write it like this:
for ( i=0;
On Jan 30, 2008, at 9:13 PM, Karl Swedberg wrote:
If you can assign class="port" to each of those elements, you could
do this:
$('.port').each(function(index) {
$(this).click(function() {bigchart(index)});
}
if you can't assign a class, then change $('.port') to $
('[id^=port]') ,
The only thing you need to do is to capture the number on a scope.
Like this:
function bind( num ){
$('#port'+num).click(function(){ bigchart(num); });
};
for( var i=0; i<5; i++ )
bind( i );
And voila, you can also do:
function getHandler( num ){
return function(){ bigchart(num); });
On Jan 30, 2008, at 3:10 PM, timothytoe wrote:
I think I submitted a half-done version of this message by accident a
few minutes ago. Sorry.
This works:
$("#port0").click(function() {bigchart(0)});
$("#port1").click(function() {bigchart(1)});
$("#port2").click(function() {bigchart(2)});
$
I'm yet to be an expert in jQuery :) But I would solve that like this:
$(".port").click(function() {bigchart($(this).attr('port-id') )});
now in your html code, I guess its like:
change to
Feijó
timothytoe escreveu:
I think I submitted a half-done version of this message by ac
There is a clever way -- in John Resig's book he talks about it -- it
involves executing the anonymous function right after declaring it, when in
a for loop:
function() { do whatever; }();
But, I tried some experiments and I couldn't get it to work right.
-- Josh
I ended up doing someth
I ended up doing something similar to what you suggest, but I really
was hoping to elicit some clever way to get the value of the variable
at the time of the assignment, rather than the "5" that I get because
the closure is maintaining the context.
Is there a way to set these event handlers up in
Instead of binding five times, you can do it dynamically:
$("[id^=port]").click(function() {
bigchart( this.id.charAt(this.id.length-1) );
});
Something close to that should do it. Although if you end up with 10 or
more clickables you'll have to change your naming scheme a bit.
-- Jo
15 matches
Mail list logo
