Yeah it isn't a very fair comparison. There is a lot that goes on to solve
cross-browser issues and memory leaks. For example, jQuery removes each
child node and its events. The replaceHtml function is a really nice
optimization and could easily be made into a plugin if desired. (untested
but shoul
John, I slapped this modified version of my test page together in a
couple minutes:
http://stevenlevithan.com/demo/replaceHtml_jQuery.html
jQuery.html() seems to perform pretty terribly, to be honest. The
15,000 element "destroy & create" test in IE7, for example, is over
500 times slower than r
You're in luck! jQuery already pre-empties an element inside .html().
Calling .html() actually does:
.empty().append("html string");
Although, there's a lot of other issues at play inside .append() in
order to make it work cross browser, so those innerHTML benefits have
probably be nullified in
Excellent, I'll look into this.
~Sean
On 9/12/07, Felix Geisendörfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Here is an interesting blog post that I came across:
>
> http://blog.stevenlevithan.com/archives/faster-than-innerhtml
>
> The synopsis basically is that one can gain dramatic speed improvements o
4 matches
Mail list logo
