[jQuery] Re: Expression/Selector question...

2008-05-12 Thread baumichel
I was confronted with a similar problem a few weeks ago and solved it by borrowing some code from the YUI library. So I composed this little plugin: (function($) { $.fn.extend({ isAncestor: function(descEl) { var ancEl = this[0]; if (ancEl.contains) {

[jQuery] Re: Expression/Selector question...

2008-05-08 Thread Wizzud
In the docs, where 'expr' as stated as being either a 'string' or an 'expression' it means that it is a selector expression, ie. a string that would be acceptable as a selector in $("selector"). In all the examples you have given - filter, find, parent, etc - the expected argument is a selector ex

[jQuery] Re: Expression/Selector question...

2008-05-08 Thread Dan G. Switzer, II
Karl, >Yeah, it's also strange that while this doesn't work: >$("body > ul > li").filter($li[0]); > >this does: > $("body > ul > li").not($li[0]); > >I'm a little lost by your parents example, though. Not sure exactly >what you're trying to get (esp. since you don't show where you'v

[jQuery] Re: Expression/Selector question...

2008-05-07 Thread Karl Swedberg
Hey Dan, Yeah, it's also strange that while this doesn't work: $("body > ul > li").filter($li[0]); this does: $("body > ul > li").not($li[0]); I'm a little lost by your parents example, though. Not sure exactly what you're trying to get (esp. since you don't show where you'v

[jQuery] Re: Expression/Selector question...

2008-05-07 Thread Dan G. Switzer, II
Just wonder if there were any comments to this? On May 5, 4:24 pm, "Dan G. Switzer, II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One thing that I've noticed is that the "expr" attribute is pretty > inconsistent across methods (such as filter, find, parents, parent, etc.) > The documentation is very vague abo