Yea, i guess your right. jQuery has grown on me the past few month and know
I would why I wanted to use mootools instead.
Dan G. Switzer, II wrote:
>
>
>>> guess) it a pain. the javascript class code structure it also very
>>akword
>>> to be coming from a C++ background.
>>
>>Amen, and i ha
>> guess) it a pain. the javascript class code structure it also very
>akword
>> to be coming from a C++ background.
>
>Amen, and i had the same hurdle to climb, but JavaScript isn't C++. It
>uses a completely different type of OOP. These articles may be helpful
>in understanding it:
>
>Implement
> guess) it a pain. the javascript class code structure it also very akword
> to be coming from a C++ background.
Amen, and i had the same hurdle to climb, but JavaScript isn't C++. It
uses a completely different type of OOP. These articles may be helpful
in understanding it:
Implementing class
Well i think i would one thing that might make me stay with jQuery and that
is the selector. I think the selector in jQuery is much better than
mootools, the class thing is something i can work around.
Ganeshji Marwaha wrote:
>
> Eridius,
>
> Whatever u choose is upto u, but i just want u to
Well i did getting it working with plain javascript.
I have tried to get into jQuery this weekend and it is just not working. I
mean i was able to create a ajax_request and paginator script using mootools
with 4-5 hours and just getting a simple class with mootools(or without i
guess) it a pain
you probably want somthing like,
jQuery.ajax_request = {
ajax_options : function () {
test: 'test'
},
test : function() {
alert(this.test);
}
}
im guessing...
Eridius,
Whatever u choose is upto u, but i just want u to be make a clear and
informed decision...
Anyways, the demo now will reflect creation of class outside $(function())
method. I guess, u just have to try a bit more, coz every new language or
framework has its ways of doing things, and it t
That does no achive what i want. I can only declare and instance of the
class inside the $(function()) which does not help me becuase i might want
to declare X amount of the with different names.
I guess maybe jQuery is not what i am looking for, i mean jQuery seems to
have poor OOP support whe
ok, cool thanks for the help
and to make sure i understand that code, the first part is basically the
constructor and the second part(the .prototype) is adding all the
members/methods to the class, right?
Ganeshji Marwaha wrote:
>
>>> why do i get error saying that test is not a function of t
>> why do i get error saying that test is not a function of t?
Because you are approaching it wrong. This is how u can achieve what u want
to
$.ajax_request = function(options) {
this.options = {test: "test"};
}
$.ajax_request.prototype = {
ok here is my code:
jQuery.ajax_request = function(options)
{
ajax_options =
{
test: 'test'
};
test = function()
{
alert(this.test);
}
}
var test = $.ajax_request();
test.test();
why do i get error saying that test is not a function of t?
Ganeshj
I'll follow up here as well:
To write a class how you like, you could do it like this:
function ajax_request(options){
// initialize
this.setOptions( options );
}
ajax_request.prototype = {
// members and properties
setOptions: function(options){
this.options = options;
}
};
That's the
When you create a plugin that will be executed on a selected set of DOM
elements, you use
jQuery.fn.myPlugin = function() {}
When you create a plugin that is going to be executed statically, like
$.ajax, you create it like this.
jQuery.myPlugin = function() {}
Effectively, jQuery is an instance
13 matches
Mail list logo
