[jQuery] Re: Consider a standard documentations for plugins

2007-10-29 Thread Aaron Barker
A few thoughts... 1 - There are two kinds of documentation I think we could possibly be talking about. First would be the documentation on a website (the official wiki, plugin homepage, whatever), and second would be the documentation in the .js file itself. As was mentioned by several, the wik

[jQuery] Re: Consider a standard documentations for plugins

2007-10-28 Thread Rick Faircloth
Good points, Howa... Rick > -Original Message- > From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of howa > Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2007 10:37 PM > To: jQuery (English) > Subject: [jQuery] Re: Consider a standard documentations for plugins > >

[jQuery] Re: Consider a standard documentations for plugins

2007-10-28 Thread howa
On 10月29日, 上午12時11分, "Rick Faircloth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A good idea, Howa, however I've been barking up the > "standardization", "consistency", "documentation", > "plug-in-compatibility-with-various-jquery-versions", > "bring-all-this-together-in-a-standardized-format-in-one-location"

[jQuery] Re: Consider a standard documentations for plugins

2007-10-28 Thread J rn Zaefferer
The wiki is the place to put up your plugin documentation! It provides a comprehensive format to write documentation for plugins, including API options and examples for those. Examples for more or less unofficial plugins in the wiki: http://docs.jquery.com/Plugins/Calendar http://docs.jquery.com/

[jQuery] Re: Consider a standard documentations for plugins

2007-10-28 Thread Rick Faircloth
Benjamin Sterling Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2007 6:59 PM To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com Subject: [jQuery] Re: Consider a standard documentations for plugins http://youtube.com/watch?v=Pk7yqlTMvp8 Priceless! I have offered to build or help build a CMS for jQuery that would do what I&#x

[jQuery] Re: Consider a standard documentations for plugins

2007-10-28 Thread Benjamin Sterling
and I understand it. > People give > > out of their generosity, not because they're paid. And everyone only has > so much > > free time to give. > > > > I'm just gently complaining about the situation. We have this great list > as > > the most impo

[jQuery] Re: Consider a standard documentations for plugins

2007-10-28 Thread Yehuda Katz
tc. But the list is always ready to provide guidance, and it’s much appr eciated. Rick From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Benjamin Sterling Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2007 12:49 PM To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com Subject: [jQuery] Re: Consider a standa

[jQuery] Re: Consider a standard documentations for plugins

2007-10-28 Thread Rick Faircloth
ating when trying to track down information, etc. But the list is always ready to provide guidance, and it's much appreciated. Rick From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Benjamin Sterling Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2007 12:49 PM To: jquery-en@googleg

[jQuery] Re: Consider a standard documentations for plugins

2007-10-28 Thread Benjamin Sterling
I am going to have to disagree with your feelings Rick. There is a ton of work going on to help out with documentation. I believe it is David Serduke that is adding functional examples to each function in the jQuery documentation. Feel free to go to http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-docs and

[jQuery] Re: Consider a standard documentations for plugins

2007-10-28 Thread Rick Faircloth
A good idea, Howa, however I've been barking up the "standardization", "consistency", "documentation", "plug-in-compatibility-with-various-jquery-versions", "bring-all-this-together-in-a-standardized-format-in-one-location" for months, now. The response I always get is: Core developers and plug-