OK - this is the approach I intend to take. Please let me know if I am on
the right path - or any links or pointers would also help.
My application is currently a jsp page that shows some tabs. Each tab is an
object that has various properties like name, code, id etc.
Clicking on each tab brings
That "for( i in items )" loop isn't guaranteed to enumerate the items in any
particular order. If you need something to be in a particular order, don't
use an object with string property names. Use an array, e.g.
var items = [
"1010101001010102011010100010101020101020101010101100110
> Another thought is that you could just do a replace on 0, 1 and 2 in the
> string: replace each number with the div you want, then wrap that in a div.
Yeah, I was wondering whether the regexp engine would be faster.
Something like this:
for(var item in items){
html.push(
'',
process(
Another thought is that you could just do a replace on 0, 1 and 2 in the
string: replace each number with the div you want, then wrap that in a div.
- Jack
Jack Killpatrick wrote:
assuming that your json items are objects, try this. The console
statements are for Firebug output: comment them
assuming that your json items are objects, try this. The console
statements are for Firebug output: comment them out if you don't have
firebug. This uses a few speed tricks.
// sample data
//
var items = {};
items["1"] =
'101010100101010201101010001010
I'm not sure if it matters in javascript but I would do this:
var length = item.length;
for ( var g = 0; g < length; g++) {
Instead of this:
for (var g=0; g wrote:
>
> Not sure how much it'll speed up, but instead of:
> item.substr(g,1)
> try: item[g]
>
> Then, go through this post:
> h
Not sure how much it'll speed up, but instead of:
item.substr(g,1)
try: item[g]
Then, go through this post:
http://www.learningjquery.com/2009/03/43439-reasons-to-use-append-correctly
( http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/9889ebd5e10c9122
)
Instead of concatenating stri
James wrote:
I think a good way is to put the data into a separate JSON object and
give them a unique ID (eg. item01, item02...), and assign that ID
somewhere on the links to be clicked.
var productList = {
'item01':{name:123-ABC, color:'red', price:9.99},
'item02':{name:123-ABC, color:'blu
And as an aside, I sure hope you aren't depending on the price given
in the html to be sent back to the server as the price to charge for
an item. You could end up selling a lot of $10 items for a penny
apiece when a hacker changes the values before submitting the form.
On Feb 13, 6:08 pm, RobG
Eric P wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm fairly new to jQuery (been using a few months now). Binding event
> handlers to HTML objects via jQuery is awesome,
> but I find myself struggling to find a solid (I.e., best practice) method for
> getting numerous arguments to the event
> handler that are pertine
I think a good way is to put the data into a separate JSON object and
give them a unique ID (eg. item01, item02...), and assign that ID
somewhere on the links to be clicked.
var productList = {
'item01':{name:123-ABC, color:'red', price:9.99},
'item02':{name:123-ABC, color:'blue', price:10.99
Thank you Dan, this looks good.
Still wondering, if form field access shouldn't be part of the core.
(I need it more frequently than all these slideUpBlendFadeToggle
effects ;-)
Martin
On Jun 12, 9:16 am, mar10 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what would you consider the 'best practice' to
My favorite way to get form input values and validate them is by using the
each() method.
Here's an example:
$(function()
{
$('#myForm input[type=text]').each(function()
{
switch (this.name)
{
case 'first_name':
// validate the first name input field here
At the risk of slightly drifting the subject of this thread, I took a
look at the demos for the Field plugin:
http://www.pengoworks.com/workshop/jquery/field/field.plugin.htm#examples
Does anyone know if I can use it to select all of the form fields
inside a specific div? IE:
Martin,
Check out the Field plug-in:
http://jquery.com/plugins/project/field
This provides the type of functionality you're looking for (of providing
form values back for any type of field.)
-Dan
>-Original Message-
>From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>Behal
On 03/11/2007, Sean Catchpole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>function getRecord(id,URL){
>jQuery("#ResultsTable tr .selected").removeClass("selected");
>jQuery("#"+id).addClass("selected");
> ...
> ~Sean
I think Sean meant jQuery(#ResultsTable tr.selected")...
I think you got the jist of it. Syntax looks just fine. The filter
isn't necessary, but I doubt it will be depreciated in future
releases.
function getRecord(id,URL){
jQuery("#ResultsTable tr .selected").removeClass("selected");
jQuery("#"+id).addClass("selecte
If you know the form name, you have most of what you need. Using
jQuery's selectors, get a reference to the form:
$("form[name='myform']);
Then from there find each of the child form elements (luckily, most form
elements are input boxes:
$("form[name='myform'] input);
Repeat the above for t
I was asked why I couldn't just set an action on each field. I can't
change the form as it is dynamically created. I just know the form
name.
In Prototype I used the Form Observer.
On Oct 12, 1:07 pm, mo2g <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a web page with two forms on it. It originally used Pr
One of the issues I ran into with animating tables (specifically,
TRs), is that jQuery appears to change the 'display' style from table-
row to block while animating, resulting in the row breaking completely
while animating, then popping back into place when the animation is
complete. I'd love to
mber 17, 2007 1:40 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Best Practice? Sliding table rows up and down
The other issue with table rows is the value applied to the display property
when they are shown. IIRC, the display property is reset to block, but this
messes up the layout in FF,
er 17, 2007 12:14 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Best Practice? Sliding table rows up and down
Update.
I found that one of the reasons the animation was a little choppy was that
that I wasn't explicitly defining widths for the TD in my table. Once I
defined
The other issue with table rows is the value applied to the display
property when they are shown. IIRC, the display property is reset to
block, but this messes up the layout in FF, because it requires
display: table-row to be shown properly. There was an update to
jquery.js back in late win
lf Of Glen Lipka
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 10:54 AM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Best Practice? Sliding table rows up and down
Often padding, borders and margins get in the way of smooth animation. The
same goes for UL structures as Tables. This is part of Box Model
Often padding, borders and margins get in the way of smooth animation. The
same goes for UL structures as Tables. This is part of Box Model Hell (my
own nightmare). Although I REALLY like clean code with virtually nothing in
it, I often have to add divs and layer them so that I don't put padding
Thanks a lot tobaco! That's much better! Thanks also to Will Kelly!
On Apr 5, 1:36 pm, "tobaco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you could this also do it this way:
>
>
I wrap each thumbnail with a link:
This is the amateurish jQuery code I've conjured up:
$("a#tnLink01").click(function() {
$("#mainImage").attr({src:"another_large_image.jpg"});
});
I'll need one of these functions for every thumbnail and that seems
wrong somehow, so I'd really appreciat
you could this also do it this way:
$("a.images").click(function() {
var large_img = $(this).attr('href');
$("#mainImage").attr('src', large_img);
return false;
});
this way it's more accessible for users without javascript
On 5 Apr., 12:49, "Oddish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
28 matches
Mail list logo
