You're doing it wrong, and you don't need to use live.
I tested this, and it works:
var $results = $('#ajaxSearchResults');
$('
Anyone? Thanks
Thanks James, the context parameter was what I needed.
ui.item is an object returned by Sortable containing the elements used
in sorting.
On Oct 13, 10:40 pm, James wrote:
> The jquery selector has a second parameter
> 'context':http://docs.jquery.com/Core/jQuery#expressioncontext
>
> such tha
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 6:49 AM, Matt wrote:
>
> What I want, though, is to add this class to the within my .
> I tried:
>
> receive: function(event, ui) {
>$(ui.item + ' h3').addClass('editable');
>
$(ui.item).find('h3').addClass('editable');
- Richard
The jquery selector has a second parameter 'context':
http://docs.jquery.com/Core/jQuery#expressioncontext
such that if defined it will only select what's a descendant of that
element.
You can also use find():
http://docs.jquery.com/Traversing/find#expr
By the way, what is ui.item? An object? (C
I was injecting this into the code, it Origionally was not there.
[code]
$(this).find('ul:first:hidden').css({visibility:
"visible",display: "none"}).show(400);
$(this).find('ul:first').css({visibility: "hidden"});
[/code]
I had taken a menu system that I liked and
I was injecting this into the code, it Origionally was not there.
[code]
$(this).find('ul:first:hidden').css({visibility:
"visible",display: "none"}).show(400);
$(this).find('ul:first').css({visibility: "hidden"});
[/code]
I had taken a menu system that I liked and
taking a stab at this, code seems quite strange to me
First- check your context of "this" , in your span.hover you have a
"this" looking for a child of the span that is a UL
sildedown().show() - not necessary, slidedown already takes a hidden
element and "shows" it
the css keeps functionin
Sorry, the message is "Unknown pseudo-class or pseudo-element
'first'".
Can you provide sample code or a link?
On 23 jul, 14:47, shaf wrote:
> Hi Guys
>
> I have just inserted some content into my html page and now Im trying
> to add event listeners for some of the links in the inserted content
> but nothing happens. Do I need to update something before I can add a
Something simple (without any error checking) like the following works for
me:
Object Array
var parArr = new Array('par1', 'par2', 'par3', 'par4');
var valArr = new Array('val1', 'val2', 'val3', 'val4');
function addKeysValues(original, newkeys, newvals)
{
for (var i = 0; i < newkeys.lengt
$('[id^=total_item]').not('.locked')
introvert wrote:
Hello
I have a simple jquery selector:
$('[id^=total_item]')
I would like to add a rule so that the upper code would match all
elements that don't have 'locked' class (so that it wouldnt match
those with class='locked').
How should
If you're outputting it to a HTML page, then all of the "<" characters
should be "<" and all of the ">" characters should be ">"
That will prevent them from being actual tags.
L
Paul Tarjan wrote:
Not unexpected at all, as you're appending an element. The usual
element behaviour is to run the script inside it. And it has
no display either.
You should probably use text() as Dave suggested, it will not
interpret the angled brackets - same result as if you used HTML
entities.
cheers,
ricard
If you don't want your script to be executed, don't use a
> I don't want to execute it. I want to print it out to the html page so the
> user knows how to embed this stuff on their page.
It sounds like you want .text() then. That will not interpret html
code.
I don't want to execute it. I want to print it out to the html page so the
user knows how to embed this stuff on their page.
If you actually run the code in the OP, it DOES execute, which was very
unexpected.
On 5/20/09 2:58 AM, "Ricardo" wrote:
>
> I don't see the point. That script tag you
I don't see the point. That script tag you added is not going to be
evaluated anytime, it will just sit there doing nothing. You'll have
to move it to the head to execute it.
On May 20, 2:17 am, Paul Tarjan wrote:
> I actually wanted to append the text to the document. Here is how I'm
> working
I actually wanted to append the text to the document. Here is how I'm
working around it, but I thought building up the tags using jquery
functions was the preferred method.
var embed =
$("").append(
$("")
.text(data)
.attr("i
If you select the text area and use the text() function on it, you'll get a
string back. You can do whatever you want with it from there and then just
reinsert it again, thats one option at least
cheers
Michael Lawson
Development Lead, Global Solutions, ibm.com
Phone: 1-276-206-8393
E-mail: m
Script elements are not really appended. To ensure execution you have
to append them to the head of the document or eval them. jQuery does
the latter, so the element ends up not being in the DOM at all. What
are you trying to achieve? There's no point in creating a script tag
when you can just dec
This is assuming "#second" is a tag
$("#second").clone().after('#second');
http://docs.jquery.com/Manipulation
On May 15, 12:48 pm, ScottChiefBaker wrote:
> Do you know if you can clone() and then appendTo() a
>
> http://www.perturb.org/tmp/test.html
>
> I want to something like
>
> $("#sec
There is not an error, I was just wondering if this is frowned upon.
On Apr 17, 8:32 am, Raja Koduru wrote:
> don't see any..
> what is the error you are experiencing?
>
> - raja koduru
>
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 5:30 PM, blasto333 wrote:
>
> > $.ajax({
> > type: "GET",
> > url: prefix+url,
>
There is not an error, I was just wondering if this is frowned upon.
On Apr 17, 8:32 am, Raja Koduru wrote:
> don't see any..
> what is the error you are experiencing?
>
> - raja koduru
>
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 5:30 PM, blasto333 wrote:
>
> > $.ajax({
> > type: "GET",
> > url: prefix+url,
>
don't see any..
what is the error you are experiencing?
- raja koduru
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 5:30 PM, blasto333 wrote:
>
> $.ajax({
> type: "GET",
> url: prefix+url,
> success: script_saved,
> custom_property : someVar
> });
>
> Is there anything wrong with this?
I just finished documentation on a new plugin I think might help you
in this situation. Check out: http://eric.garside.name/docs.html?p=replicator
On Apr 13, 11:04 pm, Brain Lava wrote:
> Thanks everyone! You've definitely made some great points for me to
> consider. I'm really new to scriptin
Thanks everyone! You've definitely made some great points for me to
consider. I'm really new to scripting (normally I can find plugins to
do what I want) and you're probably right that there is a much easier
solution to what I'm trying to achieve.
I'm going to take your suggestions and see what
Thanks everyone! You've definitely made some great points for me to
consider. I'm really new to scripting (normally I can find plugins to
do what I want) and you're probably right that there is a much easier
solution to what I'm trying to achieve.
I'm going to take your suggestions and see what
I'm not sure what all is involved/required for calling .unbind() to be
honest. Wouldn't it just be this._input.unbind('change') ?
or are there additional parameters required? If it needs a fn
reference, that's what hitch() returns ...
var cb = $.hitch(this, "_change");
this._input.bind('change',
> this._input.bind('change', $.hitch(this, "_onInputChange"));
How do you unbind the ‘hitched’ method?
On Apr 8, 11:04 pm, pete higgins wrote:
> My hitch() method does this kind of:
>
> http://higginsforpresident.net/js/jq.hitch.js
>
> It would look like:
>
> this._input.bind('change', $.hitch(
Since you're not using the class for styling, but indexing, why not
just use the natural index of the div in its container, or from the
jQuery object itself?
$('.ngg-gallery-thumbnail-box') is an array-like object, so you can
iterate over it, or access its members by index number, such as $
('.ng
Can you use an ordered list? elements are block level just like divs.
-Hector
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Eric Garside wrote:
>
> What's the advantage of assigning the identifier to the class? Like,
> how are you using it once you create the classes. I'm assuming there's
> an easier soluti
What's the advantage of assigning the identifier to the class? Like,
how are you using it once you create the classes. I'm assuming there's
an easier solution, especially if you're doing it dynamically.
On Apr 9, 2:54 pm, Brain Lava wrote:
> Thanks Ralph! I'll give that a try :)
>
> On Apr 9, 1
Thanks Ralph! I'll give that a try :)
On Apr 9, 10:13 am, Ralph Whitbeck wrote:
> You can use .each to iterate through each div element and increment the
> classname or ID via it's index.
>
> $("div").each(function(i) {
> $(this).addClass("classname" + i);
>
> });
>
> http://docs.jquery.com
Normally I would agree with you but the effect I'm trying to achieve
is based on the location of the image in the grid and not tied to the
image itself. I don't want the end user to have to update the CSS
every time they move an image or add a new one to their gallery. This
seemed like the best
You can use .each to iterate through each div element and increment the
classname or ID via it's index.
$("div").each(function(i) {
$(this).addClass("classname" + i);
});
http://docs.jquery.com/Core/each
HTH
Ralph
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 9:37 AM, brian wrote:
>
> That seems like you're fi
That seems like you're fighting against the convention. Why create a
zillion classes when these same divs already have an incremented ID?
(The ID being the proper place to do this sort of thin, in the 1st
place)
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 1:31 AM, Brain Lava wrote:
>
> I'm really new to jQuery and
+1
The ability to specify the scope to a handler function would be a
great addition to jQuery core.
On Apr 8, 12:03 pm, gregory wrote:
> the only difficulty I am having with
> Balazs Endresz's approach (which I have also
> implemented in my environment) is if another developer passes a
> functio
My hitch() method does this kind of:
http://higginsforpresident.net/js/jq.hitch.js
It would look like:
this._input.bind('change', $.hitch(this, "_onInputChange"));
Regards,
Peter Higgins
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 12:03 PM, gregory wrote:
>
> the only difficulty I am having with
> Balazs Endresz
the only difficulty I am having with
Balazs Endresz's approach (which I have also
implemented in my environment) is if another developer passes a
function as 'data' param, the results become unpredictable. Though I
don't *think* anybody should be passing a function to access as
event.data, it curr
by the way - tables are for laying out tabular data, an unordered list
with a list-style-type:none; is a much better bet for horizontal
navigation.
it'll work in basically the same way
first
second
third
etc.
On Apr 8, 11:29 am, "ryan.j" wrote:
> to add a new column append a TD t
to add a new column append a TD to each TR (or change the colspan of a
TD in each row you didn't modify).
you were doing this
firstsecond
when you probably want to be doing something like...
firstsecond
$('tr#row_1').append('second');
to add a new column append a TD to each TR (or change the colspan of a
TD in each row you didn't modify).
you were doing this
when you probably want to be doing something like...
$('tr#row_1').append('second');
On Apr 8, 5:33 am, skunkwerk wrote:
> Hi,
> i'm trying to make a really bas
to add a new column append a TD to each TR (or change the colspan of a
TD in each row you didn't modify).
you were doing this
when you probably want to be doing something like...
$('tr#row_1').append('second');
On Apr 8, 5:33 am, skunkwerk wrote:
> Hi,
> i'm trying to make a really bas
>From the updated jQuery 1.4 Roadmap:
> If you need a different object for the scope, why not use the data argument
> to transport it?
In OOP-style applications the handler is often not an anonymous
function but a link to the current objects's prototype method:
this._input.bind('change', this._
Thanks adelf :) I've got it to work now
On Mar 13, 3:40 pm, adelf wrote:
> $("div#images_all a:has(img)").click(function()
> {
> if($(this).data('added')) return false;
>
> $($(this).html()).appendTo("div#images_select").dblclick( function()
> { $(this).remove(); } );
>
> $(this).data('added'
$("div#images_all a:has(img)").click(function()
{
if($(this).data('added')) return false;
$($(this).html()).appendTo("div#images_select").dblclick( function()
{ $(this).remove(); } );
$(this).data('added', 1);
return false;
});
I did not test this code, but it should work. Anyway the idea
$("div#images_all a:has(img)").click(function()
{
if($(this).data('added')) return false;
$($(this).html()).appendTo("div#images_select").dblclick( function()
{ $(this).remove(); } );
$(this).data('added', 1);
return false;
});
I did not test this code, but it should work. Anyway the idea
function weightTotal(){
var total = 0;
$('.weight').each(function(){
total += +$(this).val(); //if it's an empty string +"" == 0
});
$('#grand_total').html( total + "%" );
}
cheers,
- ricardo
On Mar 6, 9:58 pm, shallowman wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am trying to add the values
temp is undefined, so you're adding undefined to the first value in
your loop. Set temp = 0;
Also, unless you're planning on using it elsewhere, you don't need to
assign var obj. And, is there any reason you're using
document.getElementById("grand_total").innerHTML instead of $
('grand_total').ht
S3Slider Plugin(JQuery) does what you
want,http://www.serie3.info/s3slider/
sharp looking demos too
HM-User wrote:
I have a number of image slides which are fading in and out and I am
also using the pager option (jQuery Cycle). What I want to know
however is, is it possible to invoke
however... when i add another image in the tab which has an anchor tag
(delete button for tab) the css explodes and the tab goes all ugly...
On Feb 25, 10:29 am, Paul Georges wrote:
> solved... wasn't liking my floating divs...
>
> On Feb 25, 9:48 am, Paul Georges wrote:
>
> > i'm trying to add
solved... wasn't liking my floating divs...
On Feb 25, 9:48 am, Paul Georges wrote:
> i'm trying to add some html to the label area of tabs in order to add
> an icon and also some divs that i can access at later times to modify
> easily.
>
> any suggestions on how to do this?
>
> at the moment i
yup figured it out, thanks guys
finally i don't change the template... i do something like this.
// add a tab with the the nick specified
$("#tabs").tabs('add' , '#' + tag, '' + nick + '');
// correct the holding div
$("#" + tag).attr("style", "width: 95%; height: 80%;");
// add the content
$("
It seems there is an animation (of 3 hero images) on your homepage and
also there is an image slide. Some jquery plugin according to this
code:
$(".slide>ul>li").css("display","block");
$.getScript("assets/js/mousewheel.plugin.js");
$.getScript("assets/js/ufslide.pl
Passing handler after scope is not suitable for two reasons:
1. There's no way to determine whether data or scope is passed in a
three-argument method call.
2. Passing scope after handler is common pattern in JavaScript 1.6
methods like forEach.
On Dec 25 2008, 11:08 pm, "Eduardo Lundgren"
wrot
You could add that to the template. Or use the add callback to
populate the tab:
$('#whatever').tabs({
add: function(event, ui) {
$(ui.panel).html( ... )
.find('input'); // do something with these inputs
}
});
It seems you have to use the add callback anyway to get to
awesome, thanks. can't believe i missed that one.
and as for the content of the tab? if i wanted a tab to always have
two textboxes, should i modify the template? and then who would i
access these two input boxes dynamically?
thanks heaps
paul
On Feb 21, 12:41 am, Klaus Hartl wrote:
> Why don
awesome, thanks. can't believe i missed that one.
and as for the content of the tab? if i wanted a tab to always have
two textboxes, should i modify the template? and then who would i
access these two input boxes dynamically?
thanks heaps
paul
On Feb 21, 12:41 am, Klaus Hartl wrote:
> Why don
awesome, thanks. can't believe i missed that one.
and as for the content of the tab? if i wanted a tab to always have
two textboxes, should i modify the template? and then who would i
access these two input boxes dynamically?
thanks heaps
paul
On Feb 21, 12:41 am, Klaus Hartl wrote:
> Why don
Why don't you put the desired label in the first place?
$('#tabs').tabs('add', '#new', 'Label');
Other than that you could utilize the add callback:
$('#tabs').tabs({
add: function(event, ui) {
// add additional html to the tab
$('span', ui.tab).html(...);
}
});
Or you
What I meant by the last question can probably be better explained by
looking at this plugin code:
http://www.gimiti.com/kltan/demo/jTree/jquery.jtree.1.0.js
Take line 55 for example;
$(container).find("li").bind("mouseover", getInitial);
and then lines 134-140;
var getInitial = function(e
> Many thanks for your reply, although I'm totally confused now ...
I was just giving an example of using type-checking on the options
argument. The following is a real snippet from the ajaxSubmit fn of
the form plugin:
if (typeof options == 'function')
options = { success: options
Mike,
Many thanks for your reply, although I'm totally confused now ...
If I understand correctly;
- options is checked for being a string (method) or a function (set
of options)
- If it's a string (and using 'a', 'b' or 'c' from my previous
example) then execute the relevant code depend
> Well, that sort of works, although I need to be able to pass (and
> within the plugin provide default) options - I can do either but not
> both so I'm a bit stumped:
Oh, I see what you mean now. Try something like this:
$.fn.myplugin = function(options) {
var defaults = { width: 300
Hi Mike,
Well, that sort of works, although I need to be able to pass (and
within the plugin provide default) options - I can do either but not
both so I'm a bit stumped:
eg,
Method only:
(function($){
$.fn.myplugin = function(option) {
this.each(function() {
> Which disables the draggable functionality - this is essentially what
> I'm after.
>
> ie,
>
> $('.selector').myplugin('somemethod');
>
> Can anyone please advise/point me in the right direction of how to do
> this?
Something like this maybe:
$.fn.myplugin = function(option) {
Date: 02/10/2009 04:24 PM
Subject:[jQuery] Re: Adding an LI element to an OL
Hi Michael,
Thanks for replying.
The sort won't need to be done very often at all s
Hi Michael,
Thanks for replying.
The sort won't need to be done very often at all so I imagine that
your solution would be ideal. Having a bit of trouble getting it to
work though:
$("#group_add").livequery('submit',function() {
var group_name = $(this).children("#group_
How often are you going to be doing this sort?
You could just say that when you add something to the list, pull them all
out and put them into an array, sort the array and then put it back out
cheers
Michael Lawson
Content Tools Developer, Global Solutions, ibm.com
Phone: 1-919-517-1568 Tieline
Using the add function for appending option tags onto elements might
help.
var i = 0, select = $("select"), opt = $('');
for (; i < 1000; i++){
var o = opt.clone();
try {
select.add(o, null); // standards compliant; doesn't work in IE
}
catch(ex) {
elSel.add(o); // IE only
}
}
Take a look at this:
http://www.texotela.co.uk/code/jquery/select/
- Original Message -
From: "roosteronacid"
To: "jQuery (English)"
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 9:44:27 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: [jQuery] Adding many elements to a element
Consider the following:
Nice Works perfectly. Exactly what i need. Never considered the
function each for this purpose!.
On Jan 7, 5:07 pm, Ricardo Tomasi wrote:
> In this line:
>
> $(".row > div").next("[Type="+$(this).attr("Type")+"]")
>
> 'this' is refering to the 'window' object or some other context, not
> the ele
In this line:
$(".row > div").next("[Type="+$(this).attr("Type")+"]")
'this' is refering to the 'window' object or some other context, not
the element you just selected.
$('.row > div').each(function(){ //inside each 'this' is the current
element
var $this = $(this), next = $this.next();
Hi Carrajo,
W3C HTML specs says: associate a label with a form control.
There are two standards ways to makup the label element - explicitly and
implicity.
See: http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/interact/forms.html#edef-LABEL
So, lets rewrite your markup using label implicity:
Honda
Toyota
+1
I like that, we can use it in many instances in jQuery UI.
On 25 Dez., 21:08, "Eduardo Lundgren"
wrote:
> The isFunction is faster now but still has more coast that when you don't
> need to call it.
>
> We should keep the handler as the last parameter to fit with the jQuery API,
> the change
The isFunction is faster now but still has more coast that when you don't
need to call it.
We should keep the handler as the last parameter to fit with the jQuery API,
the change is compatible with it.
$('div').bind('click', {data: true}, scope, *scope.internalHandler*);
Scoping events is a go
True, but the new isFunction is a couple of times faster than the old
one, though it's still many times faster to directly call
Object.prototype.toString, which is far below 0.001ms. But as the
callback function is the last parameter everywhere in jQuery it might
be confusing to change this patter
Note that isFunction is much faster now. It has been improved 3 times
between 1.2.6 and 1.3b.
On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Eduardo Lundgren wrote:
> Hi Balazs,
>
> Thanks for give us your opinion.
>
> When you use $.isFunction(data) on the bind method it is very expensive
> when you have a l
Hi Balazs,
Thanks for give us your opinion.
When you use $.isFunction(data) on the bind method it is very expensive when
you have a lot of iterations.
Diff the file I attached with the original file (rev. 5996) I made only a
small change on the bind() method, and it's compatible with data and wi
Hi, I think this would be really useful! I've also modified jQuery to
do this a while ago (1.2.6) but with the new scope being the last
argument, so it works without the data object as well:
jQuery.fn.bind=function( type, data, fn, bind ) {
return type == "unload" ? this.one(type,
how can i add jquery cycle to this??
http://malsup.com/jquery/cycle/download.html
http://illusionz.x24hr.com/?q=content/welcome#undefined
http://devkick.com/lab/galleria/
jQuery(function($) { $('ul.gallery').galleria(); });
On Dec 18, 1:55 am, expat101 wrote:
> Can someone help me wit
if i jump by clicking the thumb to the 6th image, i can then loop the
rest
On Dec 18, 1:55 am, expat101 wrote:
> Can someone help me with my gallery please
>
> why does it stop after the 5th image? all i get is a black/blank
> container?
>
> http://illusionz.x24hr.com/?q=content/welcome
>
> and
The best way (IMO) to know if they're working is to view this site in
Firefox with the Web Developers Toolbar. Under the View Source button on the
toolbar is an option for "view generated source". This will show you the
results of the page after any JavaScript has been executed. It'll display
new
Not exactly.
The $(document).ready function fires when the DOM has been fully built, so
not all the images will be loaded at that time.
You could bind to the images load method as well.
function fixDimensions()
{
var img = $(this);
img.attr('width',img.width());
img.attr('height',img.h
Thank you for your reply.
Your solution worked fine... I could add a different class to one only
one error.
A further question:
Is it possible to wrap only 2 of the errors with an extra container?
Is this possible with 'errorLabelContainer', or is that globally
set ?!
On 23 Nov., 22:24, Dan
Hi AxIF,
you can use the errorPlacement:
errorPlacement: function(error, element) {
if(element.attr("id") == 'cname'){ // match your
element's id
error.addClass("invalid"); // add invalid class
error.appendTo(element.parent()); // this line
Thanks for pointing these few things out. I will get back there any
make a few fixed.
The editor_color.getHTML() is to get the content of the wysiwyg editor
we use.
Thanks!
On Oct 29, 3:12 pm, Sam H <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 29, 4:57 pm, Nic Hubbard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I
On Oct 29, 4:57 pm, Nic Hubbard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am using the jquery each() function to find the id of text areas on
> my page. Then I need to add that id next to another function, but I
> am getting syntax errors:
>
> $('textarea').each(function() {
> var textId = $(this).a
You can do this-
Set the field to readOnly by setting value of readOnly=true
Then, bind action of $("#field").dbclick(function(){ set readOnly to
false }); and then change it.
See if your purpose is met.
Hey Jamie...
I'm using this one http://docs.jquery.com/Ajax/serializeArray
It's working for me...
On Aug 8, 7:06 am, Jamie Pittock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone able to offer any ideas?
>
> On Aug 7, 3:25 pm, Jamie Pittock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Sorry, the value would be a comm
How can I unsubscribe it?
Steve
Grr, well that didn't work. But I understand the basic premise of it,
so thank you.
-v
On Sep 30, 9:55 pm, ricardobeat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Try an ugly filter function:
>
> $(".bc-wrapper").filter(function(){
> return !/^\s+$/.test(this.textContent); // "\s" is a shorthand for
> whit
Try an ugly filter function:
$(".bc-wrapper").filter(function(){
return !/^\s+$/.test(this.textContent); // "\s" is a shorthand for
whitespace/line breaks
}).parent().addClass("none");
This will exclude from your selector all elements that have only
whitespace in it. Be weary that regexes a
@Michael Geary -- Thanks, now I get it. But the code is being output
by a CMS, which has some whitespace that is output. So then truncate
the whitespace?
@FrenchilNLA -- It seemed to make sense, but this didn't work as long
as I had that extra space. Once I took out the whitespace that Michael
Gea
your problem is coming from (this). just try :
$(".bc-wrapper:empty").parent().addClass("none");
On Sep 30, 2:09 pm, Vinoj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got the following as my jquery code:
>
> $(document).ready(function() {
> $(".bc-wrapper:empty").(this).parent().addClass(
Your div.bc-wrapper isn't empty. It has a text node in it because of the
whitespace.
Open Firebug on any page that uses jQuery and switch it to the multiline
console (orange up arrow at the bottom right). Then paste this code in, hit
Ctrl+Enter, and observe the results:
$a = $('' );
$b =
oh, I forgot to mention that IDs should be unique, you are using the
same ID for many elements - use classes instead.
On Sep 22, 3:39 pm, ricardobeat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> docs.jquery.com always helps. The has() function does what you want:
>
> $("#nav > li").has("ul").find("a.navlinkpar
docs.jquery.com always helps. The has() function does what you want:
$("#nav > li").has("ul").find("a.navlinkparent").css({
"background-image": "url(/img/nav_arrow_down.gif)",
"background-repeat": "no-repeat",
"background-position": "right center"
});
$("#nav > ul > li").has("ul").f
Brian's solution should work fine, except that clicking on the new
row's button won't create another new row, because the event isn't
being cloned along with the element. To clone events as well,
use .clone(true) instead of .clone().
Also, if you're dealing with 100 or more rows, you might
1 - 100 of 237 matches
Mail list logo
