"length" and "action" should be avoided as input names, yes. John has
some recent details on that: http://ejohn.org/blog/deadly-expandos/
Jörn
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Michael Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks - and indeed.
>
> I managed to isolate the problem down to
>
>
> .
Thanks - and indeed.
I managed to isolate the problem down to
..
and if I change this to
..
then validation happens as I would expect. Is 'length' an invalid
name for a form element in this context?
Thanks
Michael
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Jörn Zaefferer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Yes, thats right. Usually the process of extracting already reveals
the problem to the extractor...
Jörn
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 9:05 PM, Michael Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've added some validate() calls now. I assumed that this wasn't
> necessary when I explicitly call valid
Hi,
I've added some validate() calls now. I assumed that this wasn't
necessary when I explicitly call valid() but perhaps I've got that
wrong. Anyways, it doesn't appear to have changed things. The valid
call on the second form is always returning true (for IE), even if the
required fields are
I see the "valid" calls in your code, but none where you actually
initialize the validation via $(...).validate().
Could you extract a testpage?
Jörn
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 4:48 PM, Michael Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi there
>
> I'm having trouble getting the Validation plug in to wo
5 matches
Mail list logo