I've replied on that here:
http://forum.jquery.com/topic/1-8rc1-autocomplete-search-options
So far I don't plan to update the standalone plugin, though if you can
provide a patch for 1.4 compability, I'd push out another release.
Jörn
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Anthony wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Tha
Hi,
Thanks for your responses. Can I ask 1 follow up question...
Bearing in mind this has now been integrated into jQuery UI 1.8rc1, is
it safe to assume that there any no plans to make the old version 1.1
of the 'Autocomplete' plugin compatible with jQuery 1.4? The reason I
ask is that it looks
Yes, and yes.
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Jose wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 1:38 AM, Richard D. Worth
> wrote:
> > The latest version is jQuery UI Autocomplete, and it is compatible with
> > jQuery 1.4. You can find it in jQuery UI 1.8rc1:
> >
> > http://blog.jqueryui.com/2010/01/jquer
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 1:38 AM, Richard D. Worth wrote:
> The latest version is jQuery UI Autocomplete, and it is compatible with
> jQuery 1.4. You can find it in jQuery UI 1.8rc1:
>
> http://blog.jqueryui.com/2010/01/jquery-ui-1-8rc1/
Is the UI autocomplete based on Jörn's autocomplete ? If see
The latest version is jQuery UI Autocomplete, and it is compatible with
jQuery 1.4. You can find it in jQuery UI 1.8rc1:
http://blog.jqueryui.com/2010/01/jquery-ui-1-8rc1/
- Richard
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 6:44 PM, dirk.diggler wrote:
> Anthony,
>
> The short answer would appear to be no, it's
Anthony,
The short answer would appear to be no, it's not compatible. To be
fair, I'm running a slightly tweaked version of the plugin, so its
entirely possible the incompatibility is something I introduced. This
seems unlikely, though, since Firebug never even hits the breakpoint
I've set in the
You pulling the data from server side code? if so, it's that codes
responsibility to return unique values
On Jan 17, 4:25 pm, rumremix wrote:
> The autocomplete plugin I obtained
> fromhttp://bassistance.de/jquery-plugins/jquery-plugin-autocomplete/is
> working great aside from one significant
Thanks, Jon,
I tried out the technique described in the link that you provided and
it worked very well.
Thank you for saving much of my time and effort.
On Jan 15, 11:19 am, Jon Banner wrote:
> have a go withhttp://docs.jquery.com/Core/jQuery.noConflict
>
> 2010/1/15 j...@verax
>
>
>
> > I fou
have a go with http://docs.jquery.com/Core/jQuery.noConflict
2010/1/15 j...@verax
> I found the problem.
>
> Its the $ sign ! The $ sign has a very special meaning in the jQuery
> framework. So if it is used in any other Javascript that doesnt use
> jQuery, it will be incompatible. So this mean
I found the problem.
Its the $ sign ! The $ sign has a very special meaning in the jQuery
framework. So if it is used in any other Javascript that doesnt use
jQuery, it will be incompatible. So this means we should not use '$'
in our code just because it looks cool ! Also, be very careful when
yo
The code as posted (template.jsp) is correctly extracted. Probably
appears that way because of the text wrap. Its working code.
On Jan 14, 6:21 pm, MorningZ wrote:
> is that a straight dump of your code?
>
> if so, you don't have tags around your JavaScript after the
> closing