> $(selector).index(target) != -1
>
> may cause performance issue?
>
> reglib recursively check event.target and its ancestor to know whether
> it matches selector.
It depends on the selector. I'm pretty sure it depends on many
factors.
If you (f.e) click an element that is deeply nested in the
$(selector).index(target) != -1
may cause performance issue?
reglib recursively check event.target and its ancestor to know whether
it matches selector.
another question, selector with nested context may help -- as I
mentioned in the first post.
but reglib and intercept don't provide.
On Nov
Thanks for your quick reply.
Intercept do work, its source code:
$intercept.absolute = /[\s>+~]/;
if( selector == 'self' && target == this || $intercept.absolute.test
(selector)
? $(selector).index(target) != -1 :
$target.is(selector) )
jQuery.Intercept does support complex selectors.
http://plugins.jquery.com/project/Intercept
--
Ariel Flesler
http://flesler.blogspot.com
On Nov 26, 5:03 am, sliu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Event Delegation are showing its advantage,especially in large
> webapp.
> what's event delegation:http
4 matches
Mail list logo
